Suppr超能文献

利用数字 PCR 快速确定合子性。

Rapid Zygosity Determination Using Digital PCR.

机构信息

School of Biomedical and Healthcare Sciences, Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 2017 Aug;63(8):1388-1397. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.268698. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Paternal zygosity testing is used for determining homo- or hemizygosity of in pregnancies that are at a risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. At present, this is achieved by using real-time PCR or the PCR, which can be difficult to interpret and unreliable, particularly for black African populations.

METHODS

DNA samples extracted from 53 blood donors were analyzed using 2 multiplex reactions for -specific targets against a reference () to determine gene dosage by digital PCR. Results were compared with serological data, and the correct genotype for 2 discordant results was determined by long-range PCR (LR-PCR), next-generation sequencing, and conventional Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

The results showed clear and reliable determination of zygosity using digital PCR and revealed that 4 samples did not match the serologically predicted genotype. Sanger sequencing and long-range PCR followed by next-generation sequencing revealed that the correct genotypes for samples 729M and 351D, which were serologically typed as RR (DCe/DcE), were Rr' (DcE/dCe) for 729M and Rr″ (DCe/dcE), Rr (Dce/dCE), or Rr (DCE/dce) for 351D, in concordance with the digital PCR data.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital PCR provides a highly accurate method to rapidly define blood group zygosity and has clinical application in the analysis of Rh phenotyped or genotyped samples. The vast majority of current blood group genotyping platforms are not designed to define zygosity, and thus, this technique may be used to define paternal zygosity in pregnancies that are at a risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn and can distinguish between homo- and hemizygous -positive individuals.

摘要

背景

父源单体型检测用于鉴定胎儿和新生儿溶血病风险妊娠中 的同型或半同型合子。目前,这是通过使用实时 PCR 或常规 PCR 来实现的,但这些方法难以解释且不可靠,尤其是对于黑非洲人群。

方法

从 53 名献血者的 DNA 样本中分析了 2 个针对参照()的 - 特异性靶标多重反应,通过数字 PCR 确定基因剂量。结果与血清学数据进行了比较,对于 2 个不一致的结果,通过长距离 PCR(LR-PCR)、下一代测序和常规 Sanger 测序确定了正确的基因型。

结果

结果显示,数字 PCR 能够清晰可靠地确定 的单体型,并显示出 4 个样本与血清学预测的基因型不匹配。Sanger 测序和长距离 PCR 后进行下一代测序揭示,血清学分型为 RR(DCe/DcE)的样本 729M 和 351D 的正确基因型分别为 729M 的 Rr'(DcE/dCe)和 351D 的 Rr″(DCe/dcE)、Rr(Dce/dCE)或 Rr(DCE/dce),与数字 PCR 数据一致。

结论

数字 PCR 提供了一种快速准确的方法来定义血型单体型,在 Rh 表型或基因型样本分析中有临床应用。目前绝大多数的血型基因分型平台都没有设计用于定义单体型,因此,该技术可用于鉴定胎儿和新生儿溶血病风险妊娠中的父源单体型,并区分同型和半同型合子阳性个体。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验