Suppr超能文献

静脉血栓形成率增加可能与住院患者使用双氢麦角胺治疗有关。

Increased rate of venous thrombosis may be associated with inpatient dihydroergotamine treatment.

作者信息

Tso Amy R, Patniyot Irene R, Gelfand Amy A, Goadsby Peter J

机构信息

From the Headache Group (A.R.T., I.R.P., A.A.G., P.J.G.), Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco; Headache Group (A.R.T., P.J.G.), Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, King's College London; and NIHR, Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK (A.R.T., P.J.G.).

出版信息

Neurology. 2017 Jul 18;89(3):279-283. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004108. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review whether the incidence of catheter-associated venous thromboses was higher in patients receiving IV dihydroergotamine compared to lidocaine.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all admissions at the University of California, San Francisco Headache Center from February 25, 2008, through October 31, 2014, for age, sex, diagnosis, aura, treatment dose, type of IV line used, days with line, superficial (SVT) or deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and pulmonary embolism (PE).

RESULTS

A peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or midline catheter was placed in 315 of 589 (53%) admissions. Mean age was 38 years with a range of 6 to 79 years; 121 patients (21%) were ≤18 years old. Seventy-four percent (433 of 589) of patients were female. Of 263 dihydroergotamine admissions using a PICC or midline catheter, 19 (7.2%) had either an SVT or DVT or a PE; 2 patients were diagnosed with both DVT and PE. Of 52 lidocaine admissions using a PICC or midline catheter, none had a thrombotic event ( = 0.05, Fisher exact test). Age, sex, aura, total dihydroergotamine dose, and number of days with line were not significant predictors of venous thrombosis.

CONCLUSIONS

IV dihydroergotamine treatment may be associated with an increased risk of catheter-associated venous thrombosis. A low threshold for diagnostic ultrasound investigation is appropriate because anticoagulation therapy was frequently required.

摘要

目的

比较接受静脉注射双氢麦角胺的患者与接受利多卡因的患者相比,导管相关静脉血栓形成的发生率是否更高。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2008年2月25日至2014年10月31日在加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校头痛中心的所有住院病例,记录患者的年龄、性别、诊断、先兆、治疗剂量、使用的静脉输液管类型、置管天数、浅静脉血栓形成(SVT)或深静脉血栓形成(DVT)以及肺栓塞(PE)情况。

结果

589例住院病例中有315例(53%)置入了外周中心静脉导管(PICC)或中线导管。平均年龄为38岁,范围在6至79岁之间;121例患者(21%)年龄≤18岁。74%(589例中的433例)为女性。在263例使用PICC或中线导管接受双氢麦角胺治疗的住院病例中,19例(7.2%)发生了SVT或DVT或PE;2例患者同时被诊断为DVT和PE。在52例使用PICC或中线导管接受利多卡因治疗的住院病例中,无血栓形成事件发生(P = 0.05,Fisher确切概率检验)。年龄、性别、先兆、双氢麦角胺总剂量和置管天数不是静脉血栓形成的显著预测因素。

结论

静脉注射双氢麦角胺治疗可能与导管相关静脉血栓形成风险增加有关。鉴于经常需要抗凝治疗,采用低阈值的诊断性超声检查是合适的。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Cardiovascular Disease and Migraine: Are the New Treatments Safe?心血管疾病与偏头痛:新疗法安全吗?
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022 Aug;26(8):647-655. doi: 10.1007/s11916-022-01064-4. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
8
Treatment of the Patient with Refractory Headache.难治性头痛患者的治疗。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018 Mar 19;22(4):23. doi: 10.1007/s11916-018-0677-5.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验