Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚城市环境中的狐蝠——社区态度与观点

Flying-foxes in the Australian urban environment-community attitudes and opinions.

作者信息

Kung Nina Y, Field Hume E, McLaughlin Amanda, Edson Daniel, Taylor Melanie

机构信息

Queensland Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Biosecurity Queensland, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

One Health. 2015 Aug 7;1:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2015.07.002. eCollection 2015 Dec.

Abstract

The urban presence of flying-foxes (pteropid bats) in eastern Australia has increased in the last 20 years, putatively reflecting broader landscape change. The influx of large numbers often precipitates community angst, typically stemming from concerns about loss of social amenity, economic loss or negative health impacts from recently emerged bat-mediated zoonotic diseases such as Hendra virus and Australian bat lyssavirus. Local authorities and state wildlife authorities are increasingly asked to approve the dispersal or modification of flying-fox roosts to address expressed concerns, yet the scale of this concern within the community, and the veracity of the basis for concern are often unclear. We conducted an on-line survey to capture community attitudes and opinions on flying-foxes in the urban environment to inform management policy and decision-making. Analysis focused on awareness, concerns, and management options, and primarily compared responses from communities where flying-fox management was and was not topical at the time of the survey. While a majority of respondents indicated a moderate to high level of knowledge of both flying-foxes and Hendra virus, a substantial minority mistakenly believed that flying-foxes pose a direct infection risk to humans, suggesting miscommunication or misinformation, and the need for additional risk communication strategies. Secondly, a minority of community members indicated they were directly impacted by urban roosts, most plausibly those living in close proximity to the roost, suggesting that targeted management options are warranted. Thirdly, neither dispersal nor culling was seen as an appropriate management strategy by the majority of respondents, including those from postcodes where flying-fox management was topical. These findings usefully inform community debate and policy development and demonstrate the value of social analysis in defining the issues and options in this complex human-wildlife interaction. The mobile nature of flying-foxes underlines the need for a management strategy at a regional or larger scale, and independent of state borders.

摘要

在过去20年里,澳大利亚东部城市地区狐蝠(翼手目蝙蝠)的数量有所增加,据推测这反映了更广泛的景观变化。大量狐蝠的涌入往往引发社区焦虑,通常源于对社会便利设施丧失、经济损失或最近出现的由蝙蝠传播的人畜共患病(如亨德拉病毒和澳大利亚蝙蝠狂犬病毒)对健康产生负面影响的担忧。地方当局和州野生动物管理部门越来越多地被要求批准对狐蝠栖息地进行驱散或改造,以回应人们表达的担忧,但这种担忧在社区中的程度以及担忧依据的真实性往往并不明确。我们开展了一项在线调查,以了解社区对城市环境中狐蝠的态度和看法,为管理政策和决策提供参考。分析重点关注认知、担忧和管理选项,并主要比较了在调查时狐蝠管理是热门话题和不是热门话题的社区的回应。虽然大多数受访者表示对狐蝠和亨德拉病毒有中等至高度的了解,但相当一部分少数人错误地认为狐蝠会对人类构成直接感染风险,这表明存在沟通不畅或错误信息的情况,以及需要额外的风险沟通策略。其次,少数社区成员表示他们受到城市栖息地的直接影响,最有可能是那些居住在靠近栖息地的人,这表明有必要采取有针对性的管理措施。第三,包括来自狐蝠管理是热门话题的邮政编码地区的受访者在内,大多数受访者都认为驱散或扑杀都不是合适的管理策略。这些发现为社区辩论和政策制定提供了有益的参考,并证明了社会分析在界定这一复杂的人与野生动物互动中的问题和选项方面的价值。狐蝠的移动性凸显了需要在区域或更大规模上制定管理策略,且该策略要独立于州界。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/55c8/5441369/43905ade913c/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验