出版：期刊可以共享同行评审数据。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data.

作者信息

Squazzoni Flaminio, Grimaldo Francisco, Marušić Ana

机构信息

University of Brescia, Italy.

University of Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Nature. 2017 Jun 14;546(7658):352. doi: 10.1038/546352a.

DOI:10.1038/546352a

PMID:28617464

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data.

Nature. 2017 Jun 14;546(7658):352. doi: 10.1038/546352a.

Improving peer review: What authors can do.

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Dec 15;74(24):2076-2079. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170187. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators.

Physiologist. 1991 Oct;34(5):275, 278-9.

Dental publishing: Peer review reviewed.

Br Dent J. 2016 Dec 9;221(11):686. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.890.

Peer review warts and all.

Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 Aug;11(8):679. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0804-679.

Appealing the Editor's Decision: When and How.

Nurs Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;66(1):1. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000198.

Undertaking peer review for academic journals: The implications for critical care nursing.

Nurs Crit Care. 2024 May;29(3):451-454. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12986. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.020.

Peer review, scientific publishing and the law of reciprocity.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Jun;38(6):988-989. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20024.

The death of biomedical journals. Popularity does not equal peer review.

BMJ. 1995 Aug 19;311(7003):507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.507a.

引用本文的文献

Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey.

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 12;18(7):e0287660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287660. eCollection 2023.

Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals.

R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Sep 14;9(9):210681. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210681. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals.

PeerJ. 2022 Jun 7;10:e13539. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13539. eCollection 2022.

Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews.

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0259238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259238. eCollection 2022.

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0257919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257919. eCollection 2021.

Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

Neuron. 2021 Jul 7;109(13):2047-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.

Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y.

Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.

Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 6;7(2). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0299. Print 2021 Jan.

Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports.

Elife. 2020 Jul 17;9:e53249. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53249.

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Jun 26;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

Publishing: Journals could share peer-review data.

Nature. 2017 Jun 14;546(7658):352. doi: 10.1038/546352a.

Improving peer review: What authors can do.

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017 Dec 15;74(24):2076-2079. doi: 10.2146/ajhp170187. Epub 2017 Oct 26.

Publishing in peer-reviewed journals. Fundamentals for new investigators.

Physiologist. 1991 Oct;34(5):275, 278-9.

Dental publishing: Peer review reviewed.

Br Dent J. 2016 Dec 9;221(11):686. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.890.

Peer review warts and all.

Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 Aug;11(8):679. doi: 10.1038/nsmb0804-679.

Appealing the Editor's Decision: When and How.

Nurs Res. 2017 Jan/Feb;66(1):1. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000198.

Undertaking peer review for academic journals: The implications for critical care nursing.

Nurs Crit Care. 2024 May;29(3):451-454. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12986. Epub 2023 Oct 16.

Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.

Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;158(1):1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.020.

Peer review, scientific publishing and the law of reciprocity.

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024 Jun;38(6):988-989. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20024.

The death of biomedical journals. Popularity does not equal peer review.

BMJ. 1995 Aug 19;311(7003):507. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.507a.

引用本文的文献

Knowledge and motivations of training in peer review: An international cross-sectional survey.

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 12;18(7):e0287660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287660. eCollection 2023.

Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals.

R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Sep 14;9(9):210681. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210681. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals.

PeerJ. 2022 Jun 7;10:e13539. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13539. eCollection 2022.

Peer review analyze: A novel benchmark resource for computational analysis of peer reviews.

PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0259238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259238. eCollection 2022.

Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals.

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 20;16(10):e0257919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257919. eCollection 2021.

Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.

Neuron. 2021 Jul 7;109(13):2047-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.

Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 5;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y.

Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals.

Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 6;7(2). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0299. Print 2021 Jan.

Large-scale language analysis of peer review reports.

Elife. 2020 Jul 17;9:e53249. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53249.

Open up: a survey on open and non-anonymized peer reviewing.

Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Jun 26;5:8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00094-z. eCollection 2020.