• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症中的基于价值的计算器:现状与挑战。

Value-Based Calculators in Cancer: Current State and Challenges.

作者信息

Nabhan Chadi, Feinberg Bruce A

机构信息

Cardinal Health, Dublin, OH.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2017 Aug;13(8):499-506. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.022947. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1200/JOP.2017.022947
PMID:28617618
Abstract

The ASCO Value Framework, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Evidence Blocks, Memorial Sloan Kettering's DrugAbacus, and Institute for Clinical and Economic Review incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculator are value-based methodologies that attempt to address the disproportionate increase in cancer care spending. These calculators can be used as an initial step for discussing cost versus value, but they fall short in recognizing the importance of the cancer journey because they do not fully factor the patient's perspective or the global cost of care. This timely review highlights both the limitations and the advantages of each value calculator and suggests opportunities for refinement. Practicing oncologists, payers, and manufacturers should be familiar with value-based calculators because the role these tools play in cost containment is likely to be hotly debated.

摘要

美国临床肿瘤学会价值框架、美国国立综合癌症网络证据模块、纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心的药物算盘以及临床与经济评论学会增量成本效益比计算器都是基于价值的方法,旨在应对癌症治疗费用不成比例的增长。这些计算器可作为讨论成本与价值的第一步,但它们在认识癌症治疗过程的重要性方面存在不足,因为它们没有充分考虑患者的观点或整体护理成本。这篇及时的综述突出了每个价值计算器的局限性和优势,并提出了改进的机会。执业肿瘤学家、支付方和制药商应熟悉基于价值的计算器,因为这些工具在成本控制中所起的作用可能会引发激烈的争论。

相似文献

1
Value-Based Calculators in Cancer: Current State and Challenges.癌症中的基于价值的计算器:现状与挑战。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Aug;13(8):499-506. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2017.022947. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
Oncologists' Perceptions of Drug Affordability Using NCCN Evidence Blocks: Results from a National Survey.肿瘤学家对 NCCN 证据块药物可负担性的看法:来自全国性调查的结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Jun;24(6):565-571. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.17449. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
Why clinical oncologists should talk about the price of cancer drugs.临床肿瘤学家为何应谈论抗癌药物的价格。
Virtual Mentor. 2013 Aug 1;15(8):677-80. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.8.jdsc1-1308.
4
Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks.提供有意义的癌症护理:一项使用 ASCO 和 ESMO 框架评估成本和效益的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):887-894. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30415-1. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Evaluation of the ASCO Value Framework for Anticancer Drugs at an Academic Medical Center.评估学术医疗中心的抗癌药物 ASCO 价值框架。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Feb;23(2):163-169. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.2.163.
6
Do oncologists believe new cancer drugs offer good value?肿瘤学家认为新型抗癌药物具有良好的价值吗?
Oncologist. 2006 Feb;11(2):90-5. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.11-2-90.
7
How much is the life of a cancer patient worth? A pharmaco-economic perspective.癌症患者的生命价值几何?从药物经济学角度来看。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Jun;36(3):249-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01181.x. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.美国临床肿瘤学会指导声明:癌症护理的成本
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1183. Epub 2009 Jul 6.
9
Exploration of the ASCO and ESMO Value Frameworks for Antineoplastic Drugs.抗肿瘤药物的美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)价值框架探索。
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Jul;13(7):e653-e665. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.020339. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
Value Tools in Managed Care Decision Making: Current Hurdles and Future Opportunities.管理式医疗决策中的价值工具:当前的障碍和未来的机遇。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6-a Suppl):S21-S27. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.6-a.s21.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Outcome and Safety of Triweekly Modified FOLFIRINOX Therapy in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.晚期胰腺癌患者每三周一次改良FOLFIRINOX疗法的临床疗效与安全性
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Sep 12;56(1):187. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01309-6.
2
Time toxicity of lutetium 177 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.镥177对胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤的时间毒性
Endocr Oncol. 2024 Nov 20;4(1):e240028. doi: 10.1530/EO-24-0028. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
3
New Anticancer Drugs: Reliably Assessing "Value" While Addressing High Prices.
新型抗癌药物:在解决高价问题的同时,可靠地评估“价值”。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 28;31(5):2453-2480. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31050184.
4
The implementation of value-based frameworks, clinical care pathways, and alternative payment models for cancer care in the United States.美国癌症护理中基于价值的框架、临床护理路径和替代支付模式的实施。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Sep;29(9):999-1008. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22352. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
5
Defining the Role of the Modern Oncology Provider in Mitigating Financial Toxicity.明确现代肿瘤学提供者在减轻财务毒性方面的作用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2023 Jan;20(1):51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.10.011. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
6
CheckMate-067: Raising the Bar for the Next Decade in Oncology.CheckMate-067研究:为肿瘤学领域未来十年树立更高标准
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jan 10;40(2):111-113. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02549. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
The cost of chemotherapy administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.化疗管理的成本:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Jun;22(4):605-620. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01278-0. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
8
The Accuracy and Usefulness of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Evidence Blocks Affordability Rating.国家综合癌症网络证据块负担能力评级的准确性和有用性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jul;38(7):737-745. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00901-x.
9
Opportunity Costs of Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.转移性胰腺导管腺癌接受姑息性化疗的机会成本。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Aug;16(8):e678-e687. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00328. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
10
Drug Treatment Value in a Changing Oncology Landscape: A Literature and Provider Perspective.在不断变化的肿瘤学领域中的药物治疗价值:文献和提供者视角。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Feb;25(2):246-259. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.25.2.246.