Şentürk Mehmet Fatih, Yazıcı Tayfun, Gülşen Uğur
a Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Süleyman Demirel University , Isparta , Turkey.
b Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery , Bülent Ecevit University , Zonguldak , Turkey.
Cranio. 2018 Sep;36(5):332-340. doi: 10.1080/08869634.2017.1340226. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
To discuss advantages and disadvantages of TMJ arthrocentesis techniques, identifying modifications as reported in the literature.
A PubMed web-based search was carried out, using the terms TMJ and arthrocentesis, to determine the scope of coverage in well-documented articles in English.
Among 237 articles, 12 distinct techniques were described for TMJ arthrocentesis in 12 articles. Among 12 techniques, 5 were classified as double puncture arthrocentesis (DPA) and 7 as single puncture arthrocentesis (SPA). In total, 17 well documented articles about SPA were found in literature.
Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) was first described in 1991. To make the traditional procedure even less invasive, many arthrocentesis methods have been described. However, in 2015, TMJ arthrocentesis techniques were divided into two groups to limit the complexities surrounding the concepts related to TMJ arthrocentesis techniques.
探讨颞下颌关节穿刺技术的优缺点,并确定文献中报道的改良方法。
在PubMed上进行基于网络的检索,使用“颞下颌关节”和“关节穿刺术”等术语,以确定英文文献中充分记录的文章的覆盖范围。
在237篇文章中,12篇文章描述了12种不同的颞下颌关节穿刺技术。在这12种技术中,5种被归类为双穿刺关节穿刺术(DPA),7种为单穿刺关节穿刺术(SPA)。文献中总共发现了17篇关于SPA的充分记录的文章。
颞下颌关节(TMJ)穿刺术于1991年首次被描述。为了使传统手术的侵入性更小,人们描述了许多关节穿刺方法。然而,在2015年,颞下颌关节穿刺技术被分为两组,以限制与颞下颌关节穿刺技术相关概念的复杂性。