Suppr超能文献

一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后至疾病进展时间可预测接受二线分子靶向治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存情况。

Time to progression after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor predicts survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line molecular-targeted therapy.

作者信息

Ishihara Hiroki, Kondo Tsunenori, Yoshida Kazuhiko, Omae Kenji, Takagi Toshio, Iizuka Junpei, Tanabe Kazunari

机构信息

Department of Urology, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Urology, Kidney Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Arakawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2017 Sep;35(9):542.e1-542.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The effect of response to first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy on second-line survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who receive second-line molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) after first-line failure remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty patients who developed disease progression after first-line TKI, without prior cytokine therapy, were enrolled. According to the median first-line time to progression (1L-TTP), patients were divided into 2 groups (i.e., short vs. long). Second-line progression-free survival (2L-PFS) and second-line overall survival (2L-OS) were defined as the time from second-line mTT initiation. Survival was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test between patients with short and long 1L-PFS. Predictors for survivals were identified using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The median 1L-TTP was 8.84 months. Thirty patients (50.0%) with short 1L-TTP (<8.84mo) had significantly shorter 2L-PFS and 2L-OS compared to patients with long 1L-TTP (2L-PFS: 4.96 vs. 10.2mo, P = 0.0002; 2L-OS: 9.6 vs. 28.0mo, P = 0.0036). Multivariable analyses for 2L-PFS and 2L-OS showed that 1L-TTP was an independent predictor both as a categorical classification (cutoff: 8.84mo) and as a continuous variable (both P<0.05). The median follow-up duration was 13.1 months (interquartile range: 6.56-24.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who achieve a long-term response after first-line TKI therapy could have a favorable prognosis with second-line mTT.

摘要

目的

一线酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的反应对一线治疗失败后接受二线分子靶向治疗(mTT)的转移性肾细胞癌患者二线生存的影响尚不清楚。

材料与方法

纳入60例一线TKI治疗后疾病进展且未接受过细胞因子治疗的患者。根据一线进展时间中位数(1L-TTP),将患者分为两组(即短与长)。二线无进展生存期(2L-PFS)和二线总生存期(2L-OS)定义为从二线mTT开始的时间。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率,并使用对数秩检验比较1L-PFS短和长的患者。使用Cox比例风险回归模型确定生存预测因素。

结果

1L-TTP中位数为8.84个月。与1L-TTP长的患者相比,30例(50.0%)1L-TTP短(<8.84个月)的患者2L-PFS和2L-OS显著缩短(2L-PFS:4.96个月对10.2个月,P = 0.0002;2L-OS:9.6个月对28.0个月,P = 0.0036)。对2L-PFS和2L-OS的多变量分析表明,1L-TTP作为分类变量(截断值:8.84个月)和连续变量均为独立预测因素(均P<0.05)。中位随访时间为13.1个月(四分位间距:6.56 - 24.7)。

结论

一线TKI治疗后获得长期反应的患者接受二线mTT可能预后良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验