• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往接受抗血小板治疗患者使用低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶的疗效对比:ENCHANTED试验(高血压与溶栓性中风强化控制研究)

Low- Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase in Patients on Prior Antiplatelet Therapy: The ENCHANTED Trial (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study).

作者信息

Robinson Thompson G, Wang Xia, Arima Hisatomi, Bath Philip M, Billot Laurent, Broderick Joseph P, Demchuk Andrew M, Donnan Geoffery A, Kim Jong S, Lavados Pablo M, Lee Tsong-Hai, Lindley Richard I, Martins Sheila C O, Olavarria Veronica V, Pandian Jeyaraj D, Parsons Mark W, Pontes-Neto Octavio M, Ricci Stefano, Sato Shoichiro, Sharma Vijay K, Nguyen Thang H, Wang Ji-Guang, Woodward Mark, Chalmers John, Anderson Craig S

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leicester, (T.G.R.); George Institute for Global Health, Neurological and Mental Health Division (X.W., H.A., L.B., R.I.L., M.W., J.C., C.S.A.), Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales (X.W., H.A., L.B., M.W., J.C., C.S.A.), and Department of Geriatric Medicine, Westmead Clinical School (R.I.L.), University of Sydney, Australia; Stroke Trials Unit, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom (P.M.B.); Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati Neuroscience Institute (J.P.B.); Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada (A.M.D.); Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (G.A.D.); Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea (J.S.K.); Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Clinica Alemana de Santiago, Facultad de Medicina, Clinica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Chile (P.M.L., V.V.O.); Departamento de Ciencias Neurológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago (P.M.L.); Department of Neurology, Stroke Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan (T.-H.L.); Stroke Division of Neurology Service, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (S.C.O.M.); Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India (J.D.P.); Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Australia (M.W.P.); Department of Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil (O.M.P.-N.); Uo Neurologia, USL Umbria 1, Sedi di Citta di Castello e Branca, Italy (S.R.); Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan (S.S.); Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore (V.K.S.); Division of Neurology, National University Hospital, Singapore (V.K.S.); Department of Cerebrovascular Disease, 115 People's Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam (T.H.N.); The Shanghai Institute for Hypertension, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, China (J.-G.W.); Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (M.W.); George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom (M.W.); Department of Neurology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (C.S.A.); and The George Institute China, Peking University Health Sciences Center, Beijing (C.S.A.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1877-1883. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016274. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016274
PMID:28619989
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Many patients receiving thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke are on prior antiplatelet therapy (APT), which may increase symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk. In a prespecified subgroup analysis, we report comparative effects of different doses of intravenous alteplase according to prior APT use among participants of the international multicenter ENCHANTED study (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study).

METHODS

Among 3285 alteplase-treated patients (mean age, 66.6 years; 38% women) randomly assigned to low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase within 4.5 hours of symptom onset, 752 (22.9%) reported prior APT use. Primary outcome at 90 days was the combined end point of death or disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores, 2-6). Other outcomes included mRS scores 3 to 6, ordinal mRS shift, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage by various standard criteria.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in outcome between patients with and without prior APT after adjustment for baseline characteristics and management factors during the first week; defined by mRS scores 2 to 6 (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.26; =0.953), 3 to 6 (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75-1.20; =0.662), or ordinal mRS shift (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.87-1.21; =0.770). Alteplase-treated patients on prior APT had higher symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.00-3.30; =0.051) according to the safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study definition. Although not significant (-trend, 0.053), low-dose alteplase tended to have better outcomes than standard-dose alteplase in those on prior APT compared with those not using APT (mRS scores of 2-6; OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.62-1.12 versus OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.99-1.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose alteplase may improve outcomes in thrombolysis-treated acute ischemic stroke patients on prior APT, but this requires further evaluation in a randomized controlled trial.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01422616.

摘要

背景与目的

许多接受急性缺血性卒中溶栓治疗的患者之前接受过抗血小板治疗(APT),这可能会增加症状性脑出血的风险。在一项预先设定的亚组分析中,我们报告了国际多中心ENCHANTED研究(强化高血压控制与溶栓治疗卒中研究)参与者中,根据之前是否使用APT,不同剂量静脉注射阿替普酶的对比效果。

方法

在3285例接受阿替普酶治疗的患者(平均年龄66.6岁;38%为女性)中,这些患者在症状发作4.5小时内被随机分配接受低剂量(0.6mg/kg)或标准剂量(0.9mg/kg)静脉注射阿替普酶,其中752例(22.9%)报告之前使用过APT。90天时的主要结局是死亡或残疾的联合终点(改良Rankin量表[mRS]评分,2 - 6分)。其他结局包括mRS评分3至6分、mRS序数变化以及根据各种标准标准判定的症状性脑出血。

结果

在对第一周的基线特征和管理因素进行调整后,之前接受过APT的患者与未接受过APT的患者在结局方面没有显著差异;以mRS评分2至6分定义(调整后的优势比[OR],1.01;95%置信区间[CI],0.81 - 1.26;P = 0.953),3至6分(OR,0.95;95% CI,0.75 - 1.20;P = 0.662),或mRS序数变化(OR,1.03;95% CI,0.87 - 1.21;P = 0.770)。根据卒中监测研究溶栓安全实施定义,之前接受过APT的阿替普酶治疗患者有更高的症状性脑出血发生率(OR,1.82;95% CI,1.00 - 3.30;P = 0.051)。尽管不显著(P趋势,0.053),但与未使用APT的患者相比,之前接受过APT的患者中,低剂量阿替普酶的结局倾向于比标准剂量阿替普酶更好(mRS评分2 - 6分;OR,0.84;95% CI,0.62 - 1.12对比OR,1.16;95% CI,0.99 - 1.36)。

结论

低剂量阿替普酶可能会改善之前接受过APT的溶栓治疗急性缺血性卒中患者的结局,但这需要在随机对照试验中进一步评估。

临床试验注册

网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT01422616。

相似文献

1
Low- Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase in Patients on Prior Antiplatelet Therapy: The ENCHANTED Trial (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study).既往接受抗血小板治疗患者使用低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶的疗效对比:ENCHANTED试验(高血压与溶栓性中风强化控制研究)
Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):1877-1883. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016274. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
Influence of Renal Impairment on Outcome for Thrombolysis-Treated Acute Ischemic Stroke: ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study) Post Hoc Analysis.肾功能不全对溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中结局的影响:ENCHANTED(强化高血压控制和溶栓治疗卒中研究)事后分析。
Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2605-2609. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017808. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Low-Dose versus Standard-Dose Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke.低剂量与标准剂量静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性缺血性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2313-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515510. Epub 2016 May 10.
4
Comparative effects of low-dose versus standard-dose alteplase in ischemic patients with prior stroke and/or diabetes mellitus: The ENCHANTED trial.缺血性卒中患者和/或糖尿病患者中低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶的比较效果:ENCHANTED 试验。
J Neurol Sci. 2018 Apr 15;387:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: Secondary Analysis of the ENCHANTED Randomized Clinical Trial.急性缺血性卒中患者低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶治疗:ENCHANTED随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Nov 1;74(11):1328-1335. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2286.
6
Interaction of Blood Pressure Lowering and Alteplase Dose in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study.降压与阿替普酶剂量在急性缺血性脑卒中的相互作用:强化高血压控制与溶栓治疗脑卒中研究的结果。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;48(3-6):207-216. doi: 10.1159/000504745. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
7
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy vs Alteplase for Patients With Minor Nondisabling Acute Ischemic Stroke: The ARAMIS Randomized Clinical Trial.双联抗血小板治疗与阿替普酶治疗轻度非致残性急性缺血性脑卒中患者的随机临床试验(ARAMIS)
JAMA. 2023 Jun 27;329(24):2135-2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7827.
8
Low-Versus Standard-Dose Alteplase for Ischemic Strokes Within 4.5 Hours: A Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Study.4.5小时内低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶治疗缺血性卒中:一项比较有效性和安全性的研究。
Stroke. 2015 Sep;46(9):2541-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010180. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
9
Tenecteplase versus Alteplase before Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke.替奈普酶与阿替普酶在缺血性脑卒中取栓前的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 26;378(17):1573-1582. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716405.
10
Statistical analysis plan for evaluating low- vs. standard-dose alteplase in the ENhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED).在强化高血压控制与溶栓卒中研究(ENCHANTED)中评估低剂量与标准剂量阿替普酶的统计分析计划。
Int J Stroke. 2015 Dec;10(8):1313-5. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12602. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of the safety and efficacy of multi-mode NMR-guided double-antiplatelet pretreatment combined with low-dose rtPA in the treatment of acute mild ischemic stroke.多模式核磁共振引导下双重抗血小板预处理联合低剂量重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性轻度缺血性卒中的安全性和有效性研究
Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 5;16:1482078. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1482078. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and safety of intravenous alteplase for unknown onset stroke on prior antiplatelet therapy: Post hoc analysis of the EOS individual participant data.静脉注射阿替普酶治疗先前接受抗血小板治疗的不明发病时间卒中的疗效和安全性:EOS个体参与者数据的事后分析
Int J Stroke. 2025 Jul;20(6):679-686. doi: 10.1177/17474930251322034. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
3
Comparing Low- or Standard-Dose Alteplase in Endovascular Thrombectomy: Insights From a Nationwide Registry.
比较血管内血栓切除术的低剂量或标准剂量阿替普酶:来自全国登记处的见解。
Stroke. 2024 Mar;55(3):532-540. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.045851. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Coronary Angiography Complicated by Acute Ischaemic Stroke and the Use of Thrombolysis: a Cardiology Perspective and Narrative Review of Current Literature.冠状动脉造影并发急性缺血性脑卒中及溶栓治疗的应用:心脏病学视角及当前文献的叙述性综述。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2023 Nov;25(11):1499-1512. doi: 10.1007/s11886-023-01962-y. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
5
Sex Differences in Outcomes of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients with Preadmission Use of Antiplatelets.急性缺血性脑卒中患者预入院使用抗血小板药物对静脉溶栓结局的性别差异。
CNS Drugs. 2023 Apr;37(4):351-361. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-00997-7. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
6
Risk factors of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.急性缺血性卒中出血性转化的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1079205. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1079205. eCollection 2023.
7
Platelet-Mimicking Nanosponges for Functional Reversal of Antiplatelet Agents.血小板模拟纳米海绵用于抗血小板药物功能逆转。
Circ Res. 2023 Feb 3;132(3):339-354. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321034. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
8
Intravenous thrombolysis in patient with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia and antiplatelet medication.椎基底动脉延长扩张症患者的静脉溶栓治疗及抗血小板药物治疗
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Jul 18;17(9):3355-3359. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.06.061. eCollection 2022 Sep.
9
Intravenous Alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg for Unknown Onset Stroke with Prior Antithrombotic Medication: THAWS Randomized Clinical Trial.阿替普酶静脉溶栓 0.6mg/kg 治疗原因不明且有抗栓治疗史的卒中患者(THAWS):一项随机临床试验
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2023 Jan 1;30(1):15-22. doi: 10.5551/jat.63337. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
10
Low-cost alternatives for the management of acute ischemic stroke in low and middle-income countries.低收入和中等收入国家急性缺血性卒中管理的低成本替代方案。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Oct 21;72:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102969. eCollection 2021 Dec.