College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Wanglang National Nature Reserve Administration Bureau, Mianyang, 622550, China.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 15;7(1):3561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03895-3.
Artificial restoration is an important way to restore forests, but little is known about its effect on the habitat restoration of the giant panda. In the present study, we investigated the characteristics of artificial forest in the Wanglang Nature Reserve to determine whether through succession it has formed a suitable habitat for the giant panda. We compared artificial forest characteristics with those of natural habitat used by the giant panda. We found that the dominant tree species in artificial forest differed from those in the natural habitat. The artificial forest had lower plant species richness and diversity in the tree and shrub layers than did the latter, and its community structure was characterized by smaller tree and bamboo sizes, and fewer and lower bamboo clumps, but more trees and larger shrub sizes. The typical community collocation of artificial forest was a "Picea asperata + no-bamboo" model, which differs starkly from the giant panda's natural habitat. After several years of restoration, the artificial forest has failed to become a suitable habitat for the giant panda. Therefore, a simple way of planting individual trees cannot restore giant panda habitat; instead, habitat restoration should be based on the habitat requirements of the giant panda.
人工恢复是森林恢复的重要途径,但对于其对大熊猫栖息地恢复的影响却知之甚少。本研究调查了王朗自然保护区人工林的特征,以确定其是否通过演替形成了适合大熊猫的栖息地。我们将人工林特征与大熊猫自然栖息地特征进行了比较。结果表明,人工林的优势树种与自然栖息地不同。人工林的乔木和灌木层植物物种丰富度和多样性均低于后者,其群落结构表现为树木和竹子较小,竹子丛生较少且较低,但树木和较大灌木较多。人工林的典型群落配置是“云杉+无竹”模式,与大熊猫的自然栖息地有很大的不同。经过几年的恢复,人工林仍未能成为大熊猫的适宜栖息地。因此,单纯种植个别树木的方法不能恢复大熊猫的栖息地;相反,栖息地恢复应基于大熊猫的栖息地需求。