Javdan Mohammad, Tahririan Mohammad Ali, Nouri Morteza
Department of Orthopedics, Kashani Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Adv Biomed Res. 2017 Apr 25;6:48. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.205190. eCollection 2017.
This randomized, parallel-group, non-blinded study was designed to determine the role of fibular fixation in the treatment outcomes of combined distal tibia and fibula fractures.
Sixty patients with distal tibial and fibular fractures were randomly divided in two groups of case and controls. In the case group, fibula was fixed prior to the fixation of tibia. In the control group, tibia was fixed without fibular fixation. Primary outcomes were varus-valgus angulation, anterior-posterior angulation, union and side effects. Follow-up visit and radiographs were taken 2 and 4 weeks as well as 3, 6 and 9 months after surgery.
During the follow-up, 11 out of 60 patients in case and control groups were excluded. We recruited 24 and 25 patients in the case and control group, respectively. Intramedullary nailing was used in 8 patients of case and 11 patients of control group. Plate and screw were used in 16 patients in the case and 14 patients in the control group. Varus/valgus and anterior-posterior angulation were not statistically significant between two groups ( ≥ 0.05). The frequency of tibial and fibula union after 1, 3, 6 and 9 months in case and controls groups were not statistically significant ( ≥ 0.05). The frequency of nonunion of tibia and fibula, infection and nerve injury in studied groups were not statistically significant ( ≥ 0.05).
We did not observe any significant improvement using fibular fixation in the treatment outcomes of tibia distal fractures.
本随机、平行组、非盲法研究旨在确定腓骨固定在胫腓骨远端联合骨折治疗结果中的作用。
60例胫腓骨远端骨折患者被随机分为病例组和对照组。病例组在胫骨固定前先固定腓骨。对照组仅固定胫骨,不固定腓骨。主要观察指标为内外翻成角、前后成角、骨愈合情况及副作用。术后2周、4周以及3个月、6个月和9个月进行随访并拍摄X线片。
随访期间,病例组和对照组60例患者中有11例被排除。病例组和对照组分别纳入24例和25例患者。病例组8例患者和对照组11例患者采用髓内钉固定。病例组16例患者和对照组14例患者采用钢板螺钉固定。两组间内外翻及前后成角差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。病例组和对照组在1个月、3个月、6个月和9个月时胫腓骨愈合频率差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。研究组胫腓骨不愈合、感染及神经损伤的发生率差异无统计学意义(P≥0.05)。
在胫腓骨远端骨折治疗中,我们未观察到腓骨固定对治疗结果有任何显著改善。