1 University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Assessment. 2019 Apr;26(3):508-523. doi: 10.1177/1073191117714559. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
The bifactor model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been extensively explored, yet the tendency of the bifactor model to overfit data necessitates investigation of alternative, more parsimonious models, such as a modified bifactor structure. The present study used item response theory to compare unidimensional, correlated factors, bifactor, and modified bifactor models of ADHD symptoms in a clinical sample of youth ( N = 1,612) and examined differential item functioning (DIF) by age (<11 and ≥11 years) and gender. Results suggested that two restricted bifactor models showed superior fit compared with alternative models, and support strong general and inattention dimensions, with unreliable hyperactivity and impulsivity dimensions. No DIF was found across gender or age. The present study confirms that the general dimension (i.e., inhibition) and one specific dimension (i.e., sustained attention) represent distinct variability in ADHD symptoms that may improve prediction of symptom persistence, treatment response, or functional outcomes.
注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的双因素模型已经得到了广泛的探讨,但是双因素模型过度拟合数据的趋势需要研究替代的、更简约的模型,例如改良的双因素结构。本研究使用项目反应理论,比较了 ADHD 症状的单维、相关因素、双因素和改良双因素模型在临床青年样本(N=1612)中的表现,并通过年龄(<11 岁和≥11 岁)和性别考察了不同项目功能(DIF)。结果表明,与其他模型相比,两个受限的双因素模型具有更好的拟合度,并支持强烈的一般和注意力不集中维度,以及不可靠的多动和冲动维度。没有发现性别或年龄的 DIF。本研究证实,一般维度(即抑制)和一个特定维度(即持续注意力)代表了 ADHD 症状的不同可变性,这可能有助于预测症状持续、治疗反应或功能结果。