Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
Utah State University, Logan, USA.
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jul;48(7):881-894. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4.
The symmetrical bifactor model is often applied to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-hyperactive/impulsive (HI), ADHD-inattentive (IN), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, but this model frequently yields anomalous or inadmissible results. An alternative model, the bifactor S - 1 model, is more appropriate for examining the hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms. Both models were applied to ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptom ratings by mothers, fathers, and teachers for 2142 Spanish children (49.49% girls; ages 8-13 years). The symmetrical bifactor model yielded the typical anomalous loadings, with a weakly defined ADHD-HI specific factor and difficult to interpret associations of general and specific factors with correlates. In contrast, the bifactor S - 1 model with ADHD-HI symptoms as general reference factor produced clearly interpretable results. For mothers and fathers, slightly more than 50% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. For teachers, approximately 69% and 39% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms, respectively, represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. The general ADHD-HI reference factor and specific ADHD-IN and ODD residual factors showed convergent and discriminant validity across sources, along with unique associations with peer rejection, social impairment, and academic impairment factors. The bifactor S - 1 model also yielded results consistent with predictions from trait-impulsivity theory of ADHD/ODD development. Researchers should use the bifactor S - 1 model rather than the symmetrical bifactor model if hypotheses involve the latent hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms.
对称双因素模型常用于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)-多动/冲动(HI)、ADHD-注意力不集中(IN)和对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状,但该模型经常产生异常或不可接受的结果。另一种模型,双因素 S-1 模型,更适合检查 ADHD/ODD 症状的层次结构。这两种模型都应用于 2142 名西班牙儿童(49.49%为女孩;年龄 8-13 岁)的母亲、父亲和教师对 ADHD-HI、ADHD-IN 和 ODD 症状的评定。对称双因素模型产生了典型的异常负荷,ADHD-HI 特定因素定义较弱,且一般因素和特定因素与相关因素的关联难以解释。相比之下,以 ADHD-HI 症状为一般参考因素的双因素 S-1 模型产生了可清晰解释的结果。对于母亲和父亲,ADHD-IN 和 ODD 症状的真实分数方差中略多于 50%的比例代表与一般 ADHD-HI 参考因素不共享的特定剩余方差。对于教师,ADHD-IN 和 ODD 症状的真实分数方差中约有 69%和 39%分别代表与一般 ADHD-HI 参考因素不共享的特定剩余方差。一般 ADHD-HI 参考因素和特定 ADHD-IN 和 ODD 剩余因素在来源上表现出收敛和区分效度,与同伴拒绝、社会功能障碍和学业障碍因素具有独特的关联。双因素 S-1 模型也产生了与 ADHD/ODD 发展特质冲动理论预测一致的结果。如果假设涉及 ADHD/ODD 症状的潜在层次结构,研究人员应使用双因素 S-1 模型而不是对称双因素模型。