Suppr超能文献

双因素 S-1 模型在 ADHD/ODD 症状多源评定中的应用:症状评定的适宜双因素模型。

Application of the Bifactor S - 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.

Utah State University, Logan, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jul;48(7):881-894. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4.

Abstract

The symmetrical bifactor model is often applied to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-hyperactive/impulsive (HI), ADHD-inattentive (IN), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, but this model frequently yields anomalous or inadmissible results. An alternative model, the bifactor S - 1 model, is more appropriate for examining the hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms. Both models were applied to ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptom ratings by mothers, fathers, and teachers for 2142 Spanish children (49.49% girls; ages 8-13 years). The symmetrical bifactor model yielded the typical anomalous loadings, with a weakly defined ADHD-HI specific factor and difficult to interpret associations of general and specific factors with correlates. In contrast, the bifactor S - 1 model with ADHD-HI symptoms as general reference factor produced clearly interpretable results. For mothers and fathers, slightly more than 50% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. For teachers, approximately 69% and 39% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms, respectively, represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. The general ADHD-HI reference factor and specific ADHD-IN and ODD residual factors showed convergent and discriminant validity across sources, along with unique associations with peer rejection, social impairment, and academic impairment factors. The bifactor S - 1 model also yielded results consistent with predictions from trait-impulsivity theory of ADHD/ODD development. Researchers should use the bifactor S - 1 model rather than the symmetrical bifactor model if hypotheses involve the latent hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms.

摘要

对称双因素模型常用于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)-多动/冲动(HI)、ADHD-注意力不集中(IN)和对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状,但该模型经常产生异常或不可接受的结果。另一种模型,双因素 S-1 模型,更适合检查 ADHD/ODD 症状的层次结构。这两种模型都应用于 2142 名西班牙儿童(49.49%为女孩;年龄 8-13 岁)的母亲、父亲和教师对 ADHD-HI、ADHD-IN 和 ODD 症状的评定。对称双因素模型产生了典型的异常负荷,ADHD-HI 特定因素定义较弱,且一般因素和特定因素与相关因素的关联难以解释。相比之下,以 ADHD-HI 症状为一般参考因素的双因素 S-1 模型产生了可清晰解释的结果。对于母亲和父亲,ADHD-IN 和 ODD 症状的真实分数方差中略多于 50%的比例代表与一般 ADHD-HI 参考因素不共享的特定剩余方差。对于教师,ADHD-IN 和 ODD 症状的真实分数方差中约有 69%和 39%分别代表与一般 ADHD-HI 参考因素不共享的特定剩余方差。一般 ADHD-HI 参考因素和特定 ADHD-IN 和 ODD 剩余因素在来源上表现出收敛和区分效度,与同伴拒绝、社会功能障碍和学业障碍因素具有独特的关联。双因素 S-1 模型也产生了与 ADHD/ODD 发展特质冲动理论预测一致的结果。如果假设涉及 ADHD/ODD 症状的潜在层次结构,研究人员应使用双因素 S-1 模型而不是对称双因素模型。

相似文献

5
Network Analysis of ADHD and ODD Symptoms: Novel Insights or Redundant Findings with the Latent Variable Model?
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Oct;47(10):1599-1610. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00549-y.
10
The structure of childhood disruptive behaviors.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Dec;22(4):816-26. doi: 10.1037/a0020975.

引用本文的文献

2
Measurement invariance of cognitive and affective job insecurity: A cross-national study.
Afr J Psychol Assess. 2024 Apr 25;6:147. doi: 10.4102/ajopa.v6i0.147. eCollection 2024.
4
Using Bifactor Twin Modeling to Assess the Genetic and Environmental Dimensionality of Adult ADHD Symptoms.
Behav Genet. 2025 Jan;55(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10519-024-10204-y. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
5
ADHD and cognitive disengagement syndrome symptoms related to self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in early adolescents.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Mar;34(3):1195-1206. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02556-x. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
8
Structure of Psychopathology in Romanian Preschool-Aged Children in an Epidemiological and a High-Risk Sample.
JAACAP Open. 2023 Nov;1(3):173-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
9
Systematic Integration of Multi-Informant Externalizing Ratings in Clinical Settings.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2024 Apr;52(4):635-644. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01119-z. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2018 Nov;127(8):818-829. doi: 10.1037/abn0000375. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
2
Redefining the endophenotype concept to accommodate transdiagnostic vulnerabilities and etiological complexity.
Biomark Med. 2017 Sep;11(9):769-780. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2017-0002. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
5
Trait Impulsivity and the Externalizing Spectrum.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:343-368. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093253. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
7
Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives.
Psychol Methods. 2017 Sep;22(3):541-562. doi: 10.1037/met0000083. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Future Directions in Emotion Dysregulation and Youth Psychopathology.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2015;44(5):875-96. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1038827. Epub 2015 May 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验