University of Utah, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Cancer. 2017 Oct 1;123(19):3816-3824. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30780. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
The role of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is uncertain after multiple randomized clinical trials have yielded mixed results. The authors used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to determine whether CRT yields a survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone (CT).
Patients with nonmetastatic LAPC diagnosed during 2004 through 2014 were identified in the NCDB. Patients who received CT were compared with those who received CRT using chi-square analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics that were predictive of survival. Propensity score matching and shared frailty analysis were done. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to examine patients who underwent pancreatectomy and cohorts of patients who received different CT or CRT regimens.
In total, 8689 patients with LAPC were identified. CRT was associated with improved survival (median survival [MS], 13.5 months) compared with CT (MS, 10.6 months) on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; P < .001). Induction chemotherapy before CRT (HR, 0.67; P < .001) and multiagent chemotherapy (HR, 0.72; P < .001) were also identified as independent predictors of survival compared with concurrent CRT and single-agent CT, respectively. Patients in the CRT group who received multiagent induction chemotherapy had superior MS and pancreatectomy rates (MS, 17.5 months; HR, 0.70; P < .001; pancreatectomy rate, 10%) compared with those who received multiagent CT alone (MS, 12.4 months; pancreatectomy rate, 3.3%). Patients who underwent pancreatectomy experienced improved survival (MS, 22 vs 10.6 months; HR, 0.39; P < .001).
In this NCDB analysis, maximizing systemic chemotherapy before CRT improved survival compared with CT alone in patients with LAPC. Continued analysis of CRT in properly selected patients after maximized systemic therapy is needed. Cancer 2017;123:3816-24. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
多项随机临床试验结果喜忧参半,因此,对于局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)患者,放化疗(CRT)的作用尚不确定。本研究利用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)来确定 CRT 是否比单纯化疗(CT)更能带来生存获益。
从 NCDB 中筛选出 2004 年至 2014 年间诊断为非转移性 LAPC 的患者。采用卡方检验比较接受 CT 与 CRT 的患者。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析比较生存预测的人口统计学、临床和治疗特征。进行倾向评分匹配和共享脆弱性分析。进行亚组分析以评估接受胰切除术的患者和接受不同 CT 或 CRT 方案的患者队列。
共纳入 8689 例 LAPC 患者。多变量分析显示,与 CT 相比,CRT 可改善生存(中位生存时间[MS]:13.5 个月)(HR:0.80;P<0.001)。CRT 前的诱导化疗(HR:0.67;P<0.001)和多药化疗(HR:0.72;P<0.001)也分别被确定为与 CRT 同期和单药 CT 相比的独立生存预测因素。在 CRT 组中,接受多药诱导化疗的患者 MS 和胰切除术率均较高(MS:17.5 个月;HR:0.70;P<0.001;胰切除术率:10%),而仅接受多药 CT 的患者 MS 和胰切除术率均较低(MS:12.4 个月;胰切除术率:3.3%)。接受胰切除术的患者生存得到改善(MS:22 个月比 10.6 个月;HR:0.39;P<0.001)。
本 NCDB 分析显示,在 LAPC 患者中,在 CRT 前最大限度地进行全身化疗可改善生存,而不是单纯 CT。需要对充分选择的患者在接受最大程度的全身治疗后继续进行 CRT 分析。癌症 2017;123:3816-24。©2017 美国癌症协会。