Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;24(13):4001-4008. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6131-9. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Unresected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uEHCC) remains a deadly disease. Guidelines for uEHCC recommend either chemotherapy alone (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This study used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare outcomes for patients treated with CT and those who underwent CRT.
Patients with initially diagnosed non-metastatic uEHCC from 2004 to 2014 were identified. Using Chi square analysis, patients who underwent CT were compared with those who received CRT. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to compare characteristics related to survival. Propensity score matching and shared frailty analysis were undertaken to correct for baseline differences between the two groups. Additional analyses were performed to compare survival for the minority of patients who underwent surgery and advanced-stage patients.
The study identified 2996 patients with uEHCC. Chemoradiation was associated with better survival (median survival [MS], 14.5 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.84; p < 0.001) than CT alone (MS, 12.6 months). Induction of CT before CRT was associated with a trend toward decreased risk of death compared with concurrent CRT (HR 0.81; p = 0.051). For the patients able to undergo surgery after initial treatment, MS was 24.5 months (HR 0.38; p < 0.001) versus 12.2 months for those who had no surgery. For these patients, CRT also was associated with better survival (MS, 31.2 months; HR 0.66; p = 0.001) than CT (MS, 22.1 months). Positive margins at surgery yielded survival equivalent to that with no surgery.
Although CRT may be associated with slightly better survival in uEHCC than CT alone, the majority of the benefit was observed for patients able to undergo eventual surgery.
未切除的肝外胆管癌(uEHCC)仍然是一种致命的疾病。uEHCC 的指南建议单独化疗(CT)或放化疗(CRT)。本研究使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)比较了接受 CT 治疗的患者和接受 CRT 的患者的结局。
从 2004 年至 2014 年,确定了最初诊断为非转移性 uEHCC 的患者。使用卡方分析比较了接受 CT 的患者和接受 CRT 的患者。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 回归分析比较了与生存相关的特征。采用倾向评分匹配和共享脆弱性分析校正两组间的基线差异。进行了额外的分析以比较少数接受手术和晚期患者的生存情况。
本研究共纳入 2996 例 uEHCC 患者。与单独 CT 相比,放化疗(中位生存时间 [MS],14.5 个月;风险比 [HR],0.84;p < 0.001)与更好的生存相关。与同期 CRT 相比,CRT 前诱导 CT 与死亡风险降低趋势相关(HR,0.81;p = 0.051)。对于初始治疗后能够接受手术的患者,MS 为 24.5 个月(HR,0.38;p < 0.001),而未手术的患者为 12.2 个月。对于这些患者,CRT 也与更好的生存相关(MS,31.2 个月;HR,0.66;p = 0.001),而 CT(MS,22.1 个月)则不然。手术时切缘阳性的生存结果与未手术时相当。
尽管 CRT 可能比单独 CT 治疗在 uEHCC 中具有稍微更好的生存获益,但大部分获益见于最终能够接受手术的患者。