Bellver Capella Vicente
Universitat de València (Espa(a)
Cuad Bioet. 2017 May-Aug;28(93):229-243.
Since two years ago Spanish public opinion is living an intense debate on the ethical and legal aspects about surrogacy. There is a shared concern about the risks of exploitation for women related to commercial surrogacy. To get rid of them, and make possible at the same time that people who is not able to gestate could become father/mother, it has been proposed to regulate altruistic surrogacy. In order to defend this proposal it is said that there is an analogy between altruistic organ donation and altruistic surrogacy: you can help a person in need giving an organ or your ability to gestate. In this paper I confront both considerations. First, there is not a real analogy between organ donation and altruistic surrogacy. And second, if we think seriously a possible regulation for altruistic surrogacy we will find many problems with difficult or impossible solutions.
自两年前以来,西班牙公众舆论一直在就代孕的伦理和法律问题展开激烈辩论。人们普遍担心商业代孕给女性带来的剥削风险。为了消除这些风险,同时使无法生育的人能够成为父亲/母亲,有人提议对利他性代孕进行规范。为了支持这一提议,有人认为利他性器官捐赠和利他性代孕之间存在类比关系:你可以通过捐赠器官或代孕能力来帮助有需要的人。在本文中,我对这两种观点进行了反驳。首先,器官捐赠和利他性代孕之间不存在真正的类比关系。其次,如果我们认真考虑对利他性代孕进行可能的规范,我们会发现许多问题,这些问题难以解决或无法解决。