• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人患者的颏下软组织(STC)厚度与性别、面型和骨骼分类的横断面人体研究。

Cross-sectional human study of soft tissue chin (STC) thickness in adult patients in relation to sex, facial pattern and skeletal class.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Spain.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;45(8):1205-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.002
PMID:28622922
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to study the relations between the soft tissue chin (STC) and sex, skeletal class, and facial pattern; and to describe the shape and behavior of the STC.

METHODS

385 non-growing patients were selected, 206 women and 179 men, with a mean age of 28.8 years (SD 4.2). Patients were divided into groups by skeletal class (class I, II or III) and facial pattern (brachyfacial, mesofacial or dolichofacial). STC thicknesses were measured at pogonion (Pg), soft pogonion (Pg'), gnathion (Gn), soft gnathion (Gn'), menton (Me) and soft menton (Me') in the CBCTs.

RESULTS

Sexual dimorphism was observed at Pg-Pg' and Me-Me'. STC thickness was not related to skeletal class but related to facial pattern. Pg-Pg' and Me-Me' measurements showed significant differences to the combination of skeletal class/facial pattern. STC thickness was not homogenous in terms of shape and behavior.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence of a strong but complex relationship between sex, facial pattern, skeletal class and STC thickness; for this reason, each patient must be evaluated individually before undergoing orthodontics or orthognathic surgery involving the mandible and the mandibular symphysis.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在研究软组织颏(STC)与性别、骨骼类型和面部形态之间的关系;并描述 STC 的形状和行为。

方法

选择了 385 名非生长患者,其中 206 名女性和 179 名男性,平均年龄为 28.8 岁(SD 4.2)。患者根据骨骼类型(I 类、II 类或 III 类)和面部形态(短面型、中面型或长面型)分为几组。在 CBCT 中测量了颏下点(Pg)、软组织颏下点(Pg')、下颌前点(Gn)、软组织下颌前点(Gn')、颏下点(Me)和软组织颏下点(Me')的 STC 厚度。

结果

在 Pg-Pg'和 Me-Me'处观察到性别二态性。STC 厚度与骨骼类型无关,但与面部形态有关。Pg-Pg'和 Me-Me'的测量值与骨骼类型/面部形态的组合有显著差异。STC 厚度在形状和行为方面不均匀。

结论

结果提供了强有力但复杂的证据,证明了性别、面部形态、骨骼类型和 STC 厚度之间存在关系;因此,在进行涉及下颌和下颌联合的正畸或正颌手术之前,必须对每个患者进行单独评估。

相似文献

1
Cross-sectional human study of soft tissue chin (STC) thickness in adult patients in relation to sex, facial pattern and skeletal class.成人患者的颏下软组织(STC)厚度与性别、面型和骨骼分类的横断面人体研究。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Aug;45(8):1205-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
2
Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.骨性Ⅱ类错(牙合)患者软组织颏厚度的比较评估:一项头影测量研究。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2021 Feb 28;63(1):74-80. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e52165.
3
Comparison Of Soft Tissue Chin And Lower Lip Thickness In Adult Patients With Various Mandibular Divergence Patterns.不同下颌骨偏斜模式成年患者的软组织颏部和下唇厚度比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):226-230. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-02-10491.
4
Comparison of soft tissue chin thickness at different levels of chin in subjects with various growth patterns.不同生长模式受试者下巴不同水平处软组织下巴厚度的比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2020 Mar-Apr;31(2):224-228. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_389_17.
5
Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.成年患者不同下颌偏斜模式下软组织颏部厚度的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):708-14. doi: 10.2319/062613-474.1. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
6
Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.激活器与高位牵引头帽联合治疗的效果:骨骼、牙牙槽及软组织侧貌变化
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Apr;29(2):140-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm003.
7
Assessment and Evaluation of Soft Tissue Measurements between Various Mandibular Divergences in the South Indian Population: A Cephalometric Study.南印度人群不同下颌偏斜度之间软组织测量的评估与评价:一项头影测量研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S152-S155. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_715_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
8
Size and shape of soft-tissue facial profile: effects of age, gender, and skeletal class.面部软组织轮廓的大小和形状:年龄、性别及骨骼类型的影响
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997 Nov;34(6):498-504. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0498_sasost_2.3.co_2.
9
Changes in the soft tissue chin after orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗后软组织颏部的变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Jul;98(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70030-G.
10
Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.美观与不美观面部轮廓的光度分析。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Mar-Apr;19(2):66-75. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.066-075.oar.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the postoperative soft tissue changes in different vertical facial divergent patients with mandibular prognathism.研究不同垂直面部差异的下颌前突患者术后软组织变化。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1443-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.03.024. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描结合三维面部照片对面部不对称患者进行软组织补偿评估。
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 7;10(6):e27720. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27720. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
3
Evaluation of facial soft tissue thickness in asymmetric mandibular deformities after orthognathic surgery.
正颌外科手术后不对称下颌畸形面部软组织厚度的评估
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Oct 9;43(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s40902-021-00323-5.
4
Association of Upper Lip Morphology Characteristics with Sagittal and Vertical Skeletal Patterns: A Cross Sectional Study.上唇形态特征与矢状和垂直骨骼模式的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 18;11(9):1713. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11091713.
5
Factors associated with the morphology of the mandibular symphysis and soft tissue chin.与下颌联合形态和软组织颏相关的因素。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Sep 10;26(4):e2119347. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.e2119347.oar. eCollection 2021.
6
Similarity index for intuitive assessment of three-dimensional facial asymmetry.直观评估三维面部不对称的相似指数。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 29;9(1):10959. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47477-x.