• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童股骨扭转的MRI评估:我们应该使用骨轮廓还是软骨轮廓?

Femoral torsion assessment with MRI in children: Should we use the bony or cartilaginous contours?

作者信息

Rosskopf Andrea B, Agten Christoph A, Ramseier Leonhard E, Pfirrmann Christian W A, Buck Florian M

机构信息

Radiology, Orthopedic University Hospital Balgrist, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland.

University of Zurich, Faculty of Medicine, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist Orthopedic University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jul;92:153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 May 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.021
PMID:28624013
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the use of cartilaginous contours at the femoral condyles instead of bony contours significantly changes femoral torsion measurements in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Femoral torsion was measured in 32 girls (mean age 10.1 years±2.3 standard deviation) and 42 boys (10.9 years±2.5) on axial magnetic resonance (MR) images by two independent readers (R1,R2). The femoral condyle angle was measured using each the cartilaginous and bony contours of the distal femur. Cartilage thickness at femoral condyles was assessed. Intraclass-correlation-coefficient (ICC) and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Mean difference between cartilaginous and bony femoral torsion in girls was -1.1°±1.75 (range, -5.4° to 3.1°) for R1 and -1.64°±1.67 (-6.3° to 2.1°) for R2, in boys -1.5°±1.87 (-8.4° to 1.1°) for R1 and -2.28°±1.48 (-4.3° to 9.7°) for R2. Weak-to-moderate correlations between difference of cartilaginous-versus-bony measurements and cartilage thickness (r=-0.15 to -0.55, P<0.001-0.46) or age (r=-0.33 to 0.46, P<0.001-0.006) were found for both genders. Intermethod-ICC for cartilaginous versus bony femoral torsion measurements was 0.99/0.99 for R1/R2 in girls, and 0.99/0.98 in boys.

CONCLUSION

There is only a small difference when measuring femoral torsion through cartilaginous versus bony contours, and no major difference in this between boys and girls.

摘要

目的

评估在儿童中使用股骨髁的软骨轮廓而非骨轮廓是否会显著改变股骨扭转测量值。

材料与方法

两名独立阅片者(R1、R2)在32名女孩(平均年龄10.1岁±2.3标准差)和42名男孩(10.9岁±2.5)的轴向磁共振(MR)图像上测量股骨扭转。使用股骨远端的软骨和骨轮廓分别测量股骨髁角。评估股骨髁处的软骨厚度。采用组内相关系数(ICC)和Pearson相关性进行统计分析。

结果

女孩中,R1测量的软骨与骨股骨扭转平均差值为-1.1°±1.75(范围,-5.4°至3.1°),R2为-1.64°±1.67(-6.3°至2.1°);男孩中,R1为-1.5°±1.87(-8.4°至1.1°),R2为-2.28°±1.48(-4.3°至9.7°)。发现男女两性软骨与骨测量差值与软骨厚度(r=-0.15至-0.55,P<0.001至0.46)或年龄(r=-0.33至0.46,P<0.001至0.006)之间存在弱至中度相关性。女孩中,R1/R2测量软骨与骨股骨扭转的组间ICC为0.99/0.99,男孩中为0.99/0.98。

结论

通过软骨轮廓与骨轮廓测量股骨扭转时仅有微小差异,且男孩和女孩之间无重大差异。

相似文献

1
Femoral torsion assessment with MRI in children: Should we use the bony or cartilaginous contours?儿童股骨扭转的MRI评估:我们应该使用骨轮廓还是软骨轮廓?
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Jul;92:153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.021. Epub 2017 May 1.
2
Femoral and tibial torsion measurements in children and adolescents: comparison of MRI and 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs.儿童和青少年股骨与胫骨扭转测量:基于低剂量双平面X线片的MRI与3D模型比较
Skeletal Radiol. 2017 Apr;46(4):469-476. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2569-x. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Measurement of femoral torsion by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: concurrent validity.超声和磁共振成像测量股骨扭转:并行效度。
Phys Ther. 2010 Nov;90(11):1641-8. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090391. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
4
Femoral and tibial torsion measurement in children and adolescents: comparison of 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiography and low-dose CT.儿童和青少年股骨和胫骨扭转测量:基于低剂量双平面 X 射线和低剂量 CT 的 3D 模型比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):W285-91. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11103.
5
Accuracy and Reliability of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared With True Anatomic Femoral Version.计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像与真实解剖股骨扭转角相比的准确性和可靠性
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jun;37(4):e265-e270. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000959.
6
Measurement of femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion by magnetic resonance imaging.通过磁共振成像测量股骨前倾角和胫骨扭转角。
Br J Radiol. 1997 Jun;70(834):575-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr.70.834.9227249.
7
Femoral Torsion: Impact of Femur Position on CT and Stereoradiography Measurements.股骨扭转:股骨位置对 CT 和立体摄影测量的影响。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Aug;209(2):W93-W99. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16638. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Normal values of bony, cartilaginous, and labral coverage of the infant hip in MR imaging.婴儿髋关节在磁共振成像中骨、软骨及盂唇覆盖的正常值。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2014 Oct-Nov;34(7):674-8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000174.
9
Femoral and tibial torsion measurements with 3D models based on low-dose biplanar radiographs in comparison with standard CT measurements.基于低剂量双平面 X 线片的 3D 模型与标准 CT 测量值比较测量股骨和胫骨扭转。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5):W607-12. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8295.
10
A new method using ultrasound for measuring femoral anteversion (torsion): technique and reliability.一种使用超声测量股骨前倾(扭转)的新方法:技术与可靠性
Br J Radiol. 1987 Jun;60(714):519-23. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-60-714-519.

引用本文的文献

1
Femoral anteversion: significance and measurement.股骨前倾角:意义与测量。
J Anat. 2020 Nov;237(5):811-826. doi: 10.1111/joa.13249. Epub 2020 Jun 24.