• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院手术量对小肠梗阻腹腔镜粘连松解术治疗效果的影响

Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction.

作者信息

Jean Raymond A, O'Neill Kathleen M, Pei Kevin Y, Davis Kimberly A

机构信息

National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.045. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.045
PMID:28624050
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Volume-to-outcome data have been studied in several complex surgical procedures, demonstrating improved outcomes at higher volume centers. Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions (LLOA) for small bowel obstruction (SBO) may result in better outcomes, but there is no information on the learning curve for this potentially complex case. This study evaluates the effect of institutional procedural volume on length of stay (LOS), outcomes, and costs in LLOA for SBOs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample data set between 2000 and 2013 was queried for discharges for a diagnosis of SBO involving LLOA in adult patients. Patients with intra-abdominal malignancy and evidence of any other major surgical procedure during hospitalization were excluded. The procedural volume per hospital was calculated over the period, and high-volume hospitals were designated as those performing greater than five LLOA per year. Patient characteristics were described by hospital volume status using stratified cluster sampling tabulation and linear regression methods. LOS, total charges, and costs were reported as means with standard deviation and median values. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 9111 discharges were selected, which was representative of 43,567 weighted discharges nationally between 2000 and 2013. Over the study period, there has been a 450% increase in the number of LLOA performed. High-volume hospitals had significantly shorter LOS (mean: 4.92 ± standard error (SE) 0.13 d; median: 3.6) compared to low-volume hospitals (mean: 5.68 ± 0.06 d; median: 4.5). In multivariate analysis, high-volume status was associated with a decreased LOS of 0.72 d (P < 0.0001) as compared to low-volume status. Other significant predictors for decreased LOS included decreased age, decreased comorbidity, and the absence of small bowel resection. There was no significant association between volume status and total charges in multivariate or univariate models, but high-volume hospitals were associated with lower costs in multivariate models by approximately $984 (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that high hospital volume was associated with decreased LOS for LLOA in SBO. Although volume was not associated with differences in total charges, there was a small decrease in hospital costs.

摘要

背景

在几种复杂的外科手术中已对手术量与治疗结果的数据进行了研究,结果表明在手术量较大的中心治疗效果更佳。腹腔镜粘连松解术(LLOA)治疗小肠梗阻(SBO)可能会带来更好的治疗效果,但对于这种潜在复杂病例的学习曲线尚无相关信息。本研究评估了机构手术量对SBO的LLOA治疗中住院时间(LOS)、治疗结果和成本的影响。

材料与方法

查询2000年至2013年全国住院患者样本数据集,以获取诊断为SBO且接受LLOA治疗的成年患者出院信息。排除有腹腔内恶性肿瘤以及住院期间有任何其他 major 外科手术证据的患者。计算该时间段内每家医院的手术量,手术量大的医院定义为每年进行超过5例LLOA手术的医院。使用分层整群抽样列表法和线性回归方法按医院手术量状态描述患者特征。LOS、总费用和成本以均值(标准差)和中位数报告。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共选取9111例出院病例,代表了2000年至2013年全国43567例加权出院病例。在研究期间,LLOA手术量增加了450%。与手术量小的医院相比,手术量大的医院LOS显著缩短(均值:4.92 ± 标准误(SE)0.13天;中位数:3.6天),而手术量小的医院LOS均值为5.68 ± 0.06天,中位数为4.5天。在多变量分析中,与手术量小的医院相比,手术量大的医院LOS减少0.72天(P < 0.0001)。LOS缩短的其他显著预测因素包括年龄降低、合并症减少以及未进行小肠切除术。在多变量或单变量模型中,手术量状态与总费用之间无显著关联,但在多变量模型中,手术量大的医院成本降低约984美元(P = 0.017)。

结论

本研究表明,医院手术量高与SBO的LLOA治疗中LOS缩短相关。虽然手术量与总费用差异无关,但医院成本略有降低。

相似文献

1
Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for laparoscopic adhesiolysis for small bowel obstruction.医院手术量对小肠梗阻腹腔镜粘连松解术治疗效果的影响
J Surg Res. 2017 Jun 15;214:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.02.045. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
2
Will laparoscopic lysis of adhesions become the standard of care? Evaluating trends and outcomes in laparoscopic management of small-bowel obstruction using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database.腹腔镜粘连松解术会成为标准治疗方法吗?利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进项目数据库评估腹腔镜治疗小肠梗阻的趋势和结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2180-2186. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5216-z. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
The impact of laparoscopy on emergency surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: prospective single centre cohort study.腹腔镜对粘连性小肠梗阻急诊手术的影响:前瞻性单中心队列研究。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2021 Apr;103(4):255-262. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.7079. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
4
Laparotomy for small-bowel obstruction: first choice or last resort for adhesiolysis? A laparoscopic approach for small-bowel obstruction reduces 30-day complications.剖腹术治疗小肠梗阻:粘连松解的首选还是最后手段?腹腔镜治疗小肠梗阻可减少 30 天并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3162-6. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
5
Small Bowel Obstruction Is a Surgical Disease: Patients with Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction Requiring Operation Have More Cost-Effective Care When Admitted to a Surgical Service.小肠梗阻是一种外科疾病:因粘连性小肠梗阻而需要手术的患者入住外科服务科室时,可获得更具成本效益的治疗。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jul;221(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.054. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
The role of the laparoscopic approach in the surgical management of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction.腹腔镜手术在急性粘连性小肠梗阻外科治疗中的作用。
BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0504-x.
7
The First Decade of Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States: Costs and Outcomes Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.美国腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的第一个十年:使用全国住院患者样本的成本与结局
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1778-83. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4444-y. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
8
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for adhesional small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性小肠梗阻的比较:病例对照研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3209-3217. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6604-3. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
9
Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: a comparison of outcomes.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗粘连性小肠梗阻:疗效比较
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-4015-7. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
10
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic adhesiolysis for mechanical small bowel obstruction.腹腔镜粘连松解术治疗机械性小肠梗阻的临床疗效
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012 May;5(2):53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00117.x. Epub 2011 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete Impact of Care Fragmentation on Readmissions Following Urgent Abdominal Operations.急腹症手术后再入院的护理碎片化的全面影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Aug;23(8):1643-1651. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4033-1. Epub 2019 Jan 8.