Brocher Andreas, Graf Tim
Department of German Literature and Linguistics I, University of Cologne, Germany.
Department of German Literature and Linguistics I, University of Cologne, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jul 28;102:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
In this study, we investigate the effects of decision-related factors on recognition memory in pupil old/new paradigms. In Experiment 1, we used an old/new paradigm with words and pseudowords and participants made lexical decisions during recognition rather than old/new decisions. Importantly, participants were instructed to focus on the nonword-likeness of presented items, not their word-likeness. We obtained no old/new effects. In Experiment 2, participants discriminated old from new words and old from new pseudowords during recognition, and they did so as quickly as possible. We found old/new effects for both words and pseudowords. In Experiment 3, we used materials and an old/new design known to elicit a large number of incorrect responses. For false alarms ("old" response for new word), we found larger pupils than for correctly classified new items, starting at the point at which response execution was allowed (2750ms post stimulus onset). In contrast, pupil size for misses ("new" response for old word) was statistically indistinguishable from pupil size in correct rejections. Taken together, our data suggest that pupil old/new effects result more from the intentional use of memory than from its automatic use.
在本研究中,我们调查了决策相关因素对瞳孔旧/新范式下识别记忆的影响。在实验1中,我们使用了包含单词和伪词的旧/新范式,参与者在识别过程中进行词汇判断而非旧/新判断。重要的是,参与者被指示关注呈现项目的非单词相似性,而非其单词相似性。我们未获得旧/新效应。在实验2中,参与者在识别过程中区分旧单词和新单词以及旧伪词和新伪词,并且要尽可能快地进行区分。我们发现单词和伪词均存在旧/新效应。在实验3中,我们使用了已知会引发大量错误反应的材料和旧/新设计。对于误报(对新单词的“旧”反应),从允许反应执行的时间点(刺激开始后2750毫秒)起,我们发现其瞳孔比正确分类的新项目更大。相比之下,漏报(对旧单词的“新”反应)的瞳孔大小在统计学上与正确拒绝的瞳孔大小没有区别。综合来看,我们的数据表明瞳孔旧/新效应更多地源于记忆的有意使用而非自动使用。