Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC G1S 4L8, Canada; Centre des Maladies du Sein Deschênes-Fabia, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC G1S 4L8, Canada; Département de Chirurgie, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC G1S 4L8, Canada; Centre des Maladies du Sein Deschênes-Fabia, Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, 1050 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC G1S 4L8, Canada; Département de médecine Sociale et préventive, Faculté de médecine, Université Laval, Pavillon Ferdinand-Vandry, 1050 Avenue de la Médecine, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Breast. 2017 Oct;35:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
Physical activity improves the quality of life of cancer survivors, but whether there is a difference between individual vs. group physical activity is unknown.
To compare fatigue at 12 weeks in breast cancer survivors after participation in a program of group vs. individual video-assisted physical activity.
This was a randomized phase II pilot study carried out in breast cancer survivors at a tertiary breast cancer center. Eligible patients were randomized to individual or group 12-week physical activity program. The primary outcome was fatigue (FACT-F). Aerobic capacity (6-min walk test), muscular strength, and quality-of-life (FACT-G and FACT-B) were assessed. Because of poor accrual, 200 consecutive breast cancer patients were surveyed about their physical activity habits to assess reasons for low recruitment.
For all participants (n = 26; n = 12 for group vs. n = 14 for individual), there were some improvement in FACT-F, FACT-G, FACT-B, physical activity level, aerobic capacity, and shoulder strength. Among the 200 patients surveyed, 58% were interested to increase their physical activity level, 15% declared that they were already exercising enough, 9% declared being unable to, 3% declared having no time, and 2% declared having no interest, and other reasons (13%). Among the 200 patients surveyed, 25% preferred in group, 57% preferred alone, and 18% had no preference.
Low recruitment precluded conclusions about the efficacy of physical activity practiced in group vs. individually, but both groups derived a benefit. Low willingness to change exercising habits could be the biggest barrier to physical activity in breast cancer survivors.
身体活动可提高癌症幸存者的生活质量,但个体身体活动与小组身体活动之间是否存在差异尚不清楚。
比较乳腺癌幸存者参与小组与个体视频辅助身体活动计划 12 周后疲劳的差异。
这是一项在三级乳腺癌中心的乳腺癌幸存者中进行的随机二期先导研究。合格的患者被随机分配到个体或小组 12 周的身体活动计划中。主要结局是疲劳(FACT-F)。评估有氧能力(6 分钟步行试验)、肌肉力量和生活质量(FACT-G 和 FACT-B)。由于入组人数较少,对 200 名连续的乳腺癌患者进行了身体活动习惯调查,以评估低入组率的原因。
对于所有参与者(n=26;n=12 组,n=14 个体),FACT-F、FACT-G、FACT-B、身体活动水平、有氧能力和肩部力量都有一定程度的改善。在接受调查的 200 名患者中,58%有兴趣提高身体活动水平,15%宣称已经足够锻炼,9%宣称无法锻炼,3%宣称没有时间,2%宣称没有兴趣,还有其他原因(13%)。在接受调查的 200 名患者中,25%更喜欢小组活动,57%更喜欢单独活动,18%没有偏好。
入组人数较少,无法得出小组或个体身体活动的疗效结论,但两组均受益。改变锻炼习惯的意愿低可能是乳腺癌幸存者进行身体活动的最大障碍。