Zhao Yanmin, Wang Jiasheng, Luo Yi, Shi Jimin, Zheng Weiyan, Tan Yamin, Cai Zhen, Huang He
Bone Marrow Transplantation Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
Ann Hematol. 2017 Aug;96(8):1353-1360. doi: 10.1007/s00277-017-3021-y. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
The relative merits of reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RIST) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in the first chronic phase (CP) in imatinib era have not been evaluated. The study was designed to compare the outcomes of combination therapy of RIST plus imatinib (RIST + IM) vs. imatinib (IM) alone for young patients with early CP (ECP) and late CP (LCP). Of the patients, 130 were non-randomly assigned to treatment with IM alone (n = 88) or RIST + IM (n = 42). The 10-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were comparable between RIST + IM and IM groups. LCP, high Sokal score, and no complete cytogenetic response at 3 months were adverse prognostic factors for survival, but only the time from diagnosis to IM was an independent predictor after multivariate analysis. For ECP, IM was similar to RIST + IM, with 10-year EFS rates of 77.2 vs. 81.6% (p = 0.876) and OS rates of 93.8 vs. 87.9% (p = 0.102), respectively. For LCP, both treatments resulted in similar survival, but more patients in the imatinib group experienced events (10-year EFS 40.8 vs. 66.7%, p = 0.047). The patients with higher EBMT risk scores had an inferior survival than those with lower scores (69.2 vs. 92.9%, p = 0.04). We concluded that RIST + IM was comparable to IM in terms of OS and EFS. However, RIST + IM was more affordable than IM alone in a 10-year scale. Thus, RIST + IM could be considered as an alternative treatment option, especially when the patients have low EBMT risk scores and demand a definite cure for CML.
在伊马替尼时代,对于处于慢性期(CP)的慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者,减低强度造血干细胞移植(RIST)的相对优势尚未得到评估。本研究旨在比较RIST联合伊马替尼(RIST + IM)与单纯伊马替尼(IM)治疗年轻的早期慢性期(ECP)和晚期慢性期(LCP)患者的疗效。130例患者被非随机分配接受单纯IM治疗(n = 88)或RIST + IM治疗(n = 42)。RIST + IM组和IM组的10年总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)相当。LCP、高Sokal评分以及3个月时无完全细胞遗传学缓解是生存的不良预后因素,但多因素分析后仅从诊断到开始使用伊马替尼的时间是独立预测因素。对于ECP患者,IM与RIST + IM相似,10年EFS率分别为77.2%和81.6%(p = 0.876),OS率分别为93.8%和87.9%(p = 0.102)。对于LCP患者,两种治疗的生存情况相似,但伊马替尼组更多患者出现事件(10年EFS 40.8% vs. 66.7%,p = 0.047)。欧洲血液与骨髓移植(EBMT)风险评分较高的患者生存率低于评分较低的患者(69.2% vs. 92.9%,p = 0.04)。我们得出结论,在OS和EFS方面,RIST + IM与IM相当。然而,在10年时间范围内,RIST + IM比单纯IM更经济实惠。因此,RIST + IM可被视为一种替代治疗选择,尤其是当患者EBMT风险评分较低且要求明确治愈CML时。