Mikubo Masashi, Nakashima Hiroyasu, Naito Masahito, Matsui Yoshio, Shiomi Kazu, Jiang Shi-Xu, Satoh Yukitoshi
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan; Department of Pathology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan.
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jun;108:103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
Pleural invasion has been recognized as an important negative prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and therefore, accurate evaluation is required. However, when the visceral pleura adheres to the parietal pleura around a tumor and parietal pleural structures are destroyed and unrecognizable as a result of inflammation, it is often difficult to accurately evaluate pleural invasion, and classification of the T stage is unclear. To aid in categorization, we defined this status as pl1-3 and investigated the prognostic impact of the pl1-3 status on NSCLC.
We retrospectively examined the clinicopathological characteristics and prognoses of 929 NSCLC patients who underwent curative surgical resection. The pl1-3 status was defined as invasion beyond the elastic layer of the visceral pleura (pl1 or higher) but showing unclear parietal pleural invasion. We compared the prognoses of pl1-3 status NSCLC patients with that of patients with other pleural invasion statuses.
Thirty-one patients (3%) had a pl1-3 status. The 5-year overall survival rate for pl1-3 patients was 58.9%, and the prognosis was significantly worse than pl1 (p=0.04). In pN0 cohort, pl1-3 disease had a significantly worse prognosis than pl1 and pl2 diseases (p=0.01 and 0.04, respectively) and a similar prognosis to pl3 disease. Furthermore, similar relationships were also observed after adjusting for other prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. Among the pl1-3 and pN0 patients, 11 (46%) developed recurrences (9 patients had distant metastasis, one had local recurrence, and one had both). Although the proportion of pl1-3 patients who underwent adjuvant therapy was similar to that of T3 patients, more individuals received oral tegafur-uracil treatment than intravenous chemotherapy.
These results indicate that pl1-3 patients can be managed in the same manner as patients with T3 and pl3 disease. These results may be informative for treatment decisions during postoperative chemotherapy.
胸膜侵犯已被认为是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一个重要不良预后因素,因此,需要进行准确评估。然而,当脏层胸膜在肿瘤周围与壁层胸膜粘连,且壁层胸膜结构因炎症被破坏而无法辨认时,往往难以准确评估胸膜侵犯情况,T分期分类也不明确。为了有助于分类,我们将这种情况定义为pl1 - 3,并研究pl1 - 3状态对NSCLC的预后影响。
我们回顾性分析了929例行根治性手术切除的NSCLC患者的临床病理特征和预后。pl1 - 3状态定义为侵犯超过脏层胸膜的弹性层(pl1或更高)但壁层胸膜侵犯情况不明确。我们比较了pl1 - 3状态NSCLC患者与其他胸膜侵犯状态患者的预后。
31例患者(3%)处于pl1 - 3状态。pl1 - 3患者的5年总生存率为58.9%,预后明显差于pl1(p = 0.04)。在pN0队列中,pl1 - 3疾病的预后明显差于pl1和pl2疾病(分别为p = 0.01和0.04),与pl3疾病预后相似。此外,在多因素分析中调整其他预后因素后也观察到类似关系。在pl1 - 3和pN0患者中,11例(46%)出现复发(9例有远处转移,1例有局部复发,1例两者皆有)。虽然接受辅助治疗的pl1 - 3患者比例与T3患者相似,但接受口服替加氟 - 尿嘧啶治疗的个体多于静脉化疗。
这些结果表明,pl1 - 3患者可按与T3和pl3疾病患者相同的方式进行管理。这些结果可能对术后化疗期间的治疗决策具有参考价值。