• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支架断裂和依维莫司洗脱支架植入术后支架周围对比染色——5 年结果。

Stent Fracture and Peri-Stent Contrast Staining After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation - 5-Year Outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kurashiki Central Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2017 Sep 25;81(10):1514-1521. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0236. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0236
PMID:28626202
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stent fracture (SF) and peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation are reported to be risk factors of adverse events. However, the effect of these after everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation on long-term outcomes remains unclear.Methods and Results:The study sample comprised 636 patients (1,081 lesions) undergoing EES implantation in 2010 and follow-up angiography within 1 year. The 5-year cumulative rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: a combination of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TLR) were compared between patients with and without SF or PSS. SF was observed in 2.7%, and PSS in 3.0%. The cumulative rates of MACE and TLR were significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (51.7% vs. 27.5% and 48.3% vs. 13.4%, respectively), but showed no significant differences between the PSS and non-PSS groups. In a landmark analysis, the rate of TLR within 1 year was significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (44.8% vs. 7.2%), but beyond 1 year showed no significant difference (6.3% vs 6.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-year clinical outcomes suggested that SF after EES implantation is related to increased risk of MACE and TLR, especially within 1 year after the procedure, but PSS after EES implantation is unrelated.

摘要

背景

支架断裂(SF)和支架内对比染色(PSS)是雷帕霉素洗脱支架植入后的不良事件的危险因素。然而,依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)植入后的这些因素对长期结果的影响尚不清楚。

方法和结果

本研究纳入了 2010 年接受 EES 植入术并在 1 年内进行随访血管造影的 636 例患者(1081 处病变)。比较了有和无 SF 或 PSS 的患者之间的靶病变血运重建(TLR)和主要不良心脏事件(MACE:全因死亡、心肌梗死和 TLR 的组合)的 5 年累积发生率。SF 发生率为 2.7%,PSS 发生率为 3.0%。SF 组的 MACE 和 TLR 的累积发生率明显高于非 SF 组(分别为 51.7% vs. 27.5%和 48.3% vs. 13.4%),但 PSS 组与非 PSS 组之间无显著差异。在一个时间点分析中,SF 组在 1 年内的 TLR 发生率明显高于非 SF 组(44.8% vs. 7.2%),但在 1 年以后无显著差异(6.3% vs 6.7%)。

结论

EES 植入后 5 年的临床结果表明,EES 植入后的 SF 与 MACE 和 TLR 风险增加相关,尤其是在术后 1 年内,但 EES 植入后的 PSS 与风险增加无关。

相似文献

1
Stent Fracture and Peri-Stent Contrast Staining After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation - 5-Year Outcomes.支架断裂和依维莫司洗脱支架植入术后支架周围对比染色——5 年结果。
Circ J. 2017 Sep 25;81(10):1514-1521. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0236. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Stent Fracture or Peri-Stent Contrast Staining After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.药物洗脱支架置入术后支架断裂或支架周围对比剂染色患者双联抗血小板治疗 1 年以上对临床结局的影响。
Circ J. 2017 Dec 25;82(1):211-217. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0477. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
3
Efficacy of everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with small coronary arteries (≤2.5 mm): outcomes of 3-year clinical follow-up.依维莫司洗脱支架植入术在小冠状动脉(≤2.5毫米)患者中的疗效:3年临床随访结果
Heart Vessels. 2017 Jul;32(7):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0937-4. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
4
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后病变长度和血管大小对临床结局的影响:来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统 XIENCE V 的临床评估)和 COMPARE(真实世界中第二代依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架)随机试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.
5
Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).在冠状动脉疾病中,依维莫司洗脱支架与紫杉醇洗脱支架的荟萃分析:SPIRIT 临床试验计划的最终 3 年结果(在治疗新发病变的患者中,使用依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统治疗的西里斯 V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep;6(9):914-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.005.
6
5-year results of a randomized comparison of XIENCE V everolimus-eluting and TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stents: final results from the SPIRIT III trial (clinical evaluation of the XIENCE V everolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions).SPIRIT III 试验的 5 年随机对照研究结果:依维莫司洗脱 XIENCE V 支架与紫杉醇洗脱 Taxus 支架的比较——治疗初发的 native 冠状动脉病变患者的 XIENCE V 依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统的临床评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1263-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
7
Incidence and Clinical Impact of Stent Fracture After PROMUS Element Platinum Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation.经 PROMUS Element Platinum Chromium 依维莫司洗脱支架置入后支架断裂的发生率及临床影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Aug 17;8(9):1180-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
A 10-month angiographic and 4-year clinical outcome of everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (the DiabeDES IV randomized angiography trial).糖尿病患者中依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架与西罗莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架的10个月血管造影和4年临床结果(DiabeDES IV随机血管造影试验)
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 1;86(7):1161-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25875. Epub 2015 May 6.
9
Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.随机比较依维莫司洗脱支架和西罗莫司洗脱支架在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:RACES-MI 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):849-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.02.016.
10
Five-year outcomes after first- and second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation in all patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.所有行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中,第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架植入后的 5 年结果。
J Cardiol. 2019 Aug;74(2):169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Coronary Stent Fracture Causing Myocardial Infarction: Case Report and Review of Literature.冠状动脉支架断裂导致心肌梗死:病例报告及文献综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 16;23(11):384. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2311384. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Incidence of coronary drug-eluting stent fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉药物洗脱支架断裂的发生率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 23;9:925912. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.925912. eCollection 2022.
3
Very Late Stent Thrombosis after Discontinuation of Antiplatelet Agents during Anticoagulation Therapy in a Patient with Peri-stent Contrast Staining after Implantation of a Second-generation Drug-eluting Stent.
第二代药物洗脱支架植入术后出现支架周围造影剂染色的患者,在抗凝治疗期间停用抗血小板药物后发生极晚期支架血栓形成。
Intern Med. 2022 Apr 15;61(8):1163-1167. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.8274-21. Epub 2021 Sep 25.