• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NIRCa:一种基于人工神经网络的胰岛素抵抗计算器。

NIRCa: An artificial neural network-based insulin resistance calculator.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

Department of Pediatrics, Oncology, Hematology and Diabetology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Mar;19(2):231-235. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12551. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1111/pedi.12551
PMID:28626972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Direct measurement of insulin sensitivity in children with type 1 diabetes is cumbersome and time consuming.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to develop novel, accurate machine learning-based methods of insulin resistance estimation in children with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

A hyperinsulinemic hyperglycemic clamp study was performed to evaluate the glucose disposal rate (GDR) in a study group consisting of 315 patients aged 7.6 to 19.7 years. The group was randomly divided into a training and independent testing set for model performance assessment. GDR was estimated on the basis of simple clinical variables using 2 non-linear methods: artificial neural networks (ANN) and multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARSplines). The results were compared against the most frequently used predictive model, based on waist circumference, triglyceride (TG), and HbA1c levels.

RESULTS

The reference model showed moderate performance ( R = 0.26) with a median absolute percentage error of 49.1%, and with the worst fit observed in young (7-12 years) children ( R = 0.17). Predictions of the MARSplines model were significantly more accurate than those of the reference model (median error 3.6%, R = 0.44 P < .0001). The predictions of the ANN, however, showed significantly lower error than those of the reference model (P < .0001) and MARSplines (P < .0001) and better fit regardless of patient age. ANN-estimated GDRs were within a ±20% error range in 75% of cases with a median error of 0.6% and an R = 0.66. The predictive tool is available at http://link.konsta.com.pl/gdr.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed GDR estimation model reliant on ANN allows for an optimized prediction of GDR for research and clinical purposes.

摘要

背景

直接测量 1 型糖尿病儿童的胰岛素敏感性既繁琐又耗时。

目的

我们的研究旨在开发新的、基于准确机器学习的 1 型糖尿病儿童胰岛素抵抗估计方法。

方法

对 315 名年龄为 7.6 至 19.7 岁的患者进行高胰岛素-高血糖钳夹试验,以评估葡萄糖处置率(GDR)。该组随机分为训练集和独立测试集,用于评估模型性能。基于简单的临床变量,使用两种非线性方法:人工神经网络(ANN)和多元自适应回归样条(MARSplines)来估计 GDR。结果与最常用的预测模型进行了比较,该模型基于腰围、三酰甘油(TG)和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平。

结果

参考模型的性能中等(R=0.26),中位数绝对百分比误差为 49.1%,在年龄较小(7-12 岁)的儿童中拟合效果最差(R=0.17)。MARSplines 模型的预测明显比参考模型更准确(中位数误差 3.6%,R=0.44,P<.0001)。然而,ANN 的预测误差明显低于参考模型(P<.0001)和 MARSplines(P<.0001),并且无论患者年龄如何,拟合效果都更好。ANN 估计的 GDR 在 75%的情况下误差在±20%范围内,中位数误差为 0.6%,R=0.66。预测工具可在 http://link.konsta.com.pl/gdr 上获取。

结论

基于 ANN 的开发的 GDR 估计模型能够优化研究和临床目的的 GDR 预测。

相似文献

1
NIRCa: An artificial neural network-based insulin resistance calculator.NIRCa:一种基于人工神经网络的胰岛素抵抗计算器。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Mar;19(2):231-235. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12551. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
The Higher the Insulin Resistance the Lower the Cardiac Output in Men with Type 1 Diabetes During the Maximal Exercise Test.1型糖尿病男性在最大运动试验期间,胰岛素抵抗越高,心输出量越低。
Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2017 Jun;15(5):252-257. doi: 10.1089/met.2017.0007. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
[13C]glucose breath testing provides a noninvasive measure of insulin resistance: calibration analyses against clamp studies.[13C]葡萄糖呼气试验提供了一种胰岛素抵抗的非侵入性测量方法:与钳夹试验的校准分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Feb;16(2):102-12. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0151. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
4
Insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes patients with or without microalbuminuria.伴有或不伴有微量白蛋白尿的2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素抵抗和内皮功能障碍
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004 Aug;65(2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.01.006.
5
[Leptin concentration and insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetic children and adolescents].1型糖尿病儿童及青少年的瘦素浓度与胰岛素敏感性
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2007;13(4):194-200.
6
Simple modeling allows prediction of steady-state glucose disposal rate from early data in hyperinsulinemic glucose clamps.简单建模可根据高胰岛素葡萄糖钳夹中的早期数据预测稳态葡萄糖清除率。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Feb;298(2):E229-36. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00603.2009. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
7
Clinical Remission of Type 1 Diabetes Predicts Higher Insulin Sensitivity at 7 Years from Diagnosis of the Disease.1 型糖尿病的临床缓解可预测疾病确诊后 7 年的胰岛素敏感性更高。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Aug;22(8):577-583. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0473. Epub 2020 May 19.
8
A simple prediction rule and a neural network model to predict pancreatic beta-cell reserve in young adults with diabetes mellitus.一种用于预测糖尿病青年成人胰腺β细胞储备的简单预测规则和神经网络模型。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2001 Mar;84(3):332-8.
9
Interactive calculator to estimate insulin sensitivity in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病胰岛素敏感性的交互式计算器。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 May;15(5):594-597. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14161. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
10
Development and Validation of a Method to Estimate Insulin Sensitivity in Patients With and Without Type 1 Diabetes.1型糖尿病患者和非1型糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性评估方法的开发与验证
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Feb;101(2):686-95. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3272. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of an insulin resistance prediction model in children and adolescents using machine learning algorithms.使用机器学习算法开发并验证儿童和青少年胰岛素抵抗预测模型
Transl Pediatr. 2025 Mar 31;14(3):452-462. doi: 10.21037/tp-2024-502. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
2
The Reporting Quality of Machine Learning Studies on Pediatric Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review.机器学习在儿科糖尿病研究中的报告质量:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 19;26:e47430. doi: 10.2196/47430.
3
Recent applications of machine learning and deep learning models in the prediction, diagnosis, and management of diabetes: a comprehensive review.
机器学习和深度学习模型在糖尿病预测、诊断及管理中的最新应用:一项全面综述
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Dec 27;14(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13098-022-00969-9.
4
Reduced Carbohydrate Diet Influence on Postprandial Glycemia-Results of a Short, CGM-Based, Interventional Study in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.低碳水化合物饮食对餐后血糖的影响——一项基于 CGM 的青少年 1 型糖尿病短期干预研究的结果。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 5;14(21):4689. doi: 10.3390/nu14214689.
5
Simple Method to Predict Insulin Resistance in Children Aged 6-12 Years by Using Machine Learning.利用机器学习预测6至12岁儿童胰岛素抵抗的简单方法。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022 Sep 27;15:2963-2975. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S380772. eCollection 2022.
6
A systematic review of the applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in autoimmune diseases.人工智能和机器学习在自身免疫性疾病中的应用的系统评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar 9;3:30. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0229-3. eCollection 2020.