Suppr超能文献

电临床标准和手术结果:内侧和外侧颞叶癫痫之间有区别吗?

Electro-clinical criteria and surgical outcome: Is there a difference between mesial and lesional temporal lobe epilepsy?

机构信息

Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland (SEIN), Heemstede, The Netherlands.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Acta Neurol Scand. 2017 Dec;136(6):708-714. doi: 10.1111/ane.12790. Epub 2017 Jun 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy syndrome (MTLE) with specific electrophysiological and clinical characteristics and hippocampal sclerosis (HS) on MRI is considered the prototype of a syndrome with good surgical prognosis. Ictal onset zones in MTLE have been found to extend outside the hippocampus and neocortical seizures often involve mesial structures. It can, thus, be questioned whether MTLE with HS is different from lesional temporal epilepsies with respect to electro-clinical characteristics and surgical prognosis. We assessed whether MTLE with HS is distinguishable from lesional TLE and which criteria determine surgical outcome.

METHODS

People in a retrospective cohort of 389 individuals with MRI abnormalities who underwent temporal lobectomy, were divided into "HS only" or "lesional" TLEs. Twenty-six presented with dual pathology and were excluded from further analysis. We compared surgical outcome and electro-clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Over half (61%) had "HS only." Four electro-clinical characteristics (age at epilepsy onset, febrile seizures, memory dysfunction and contralateral dystonic posturing) distinguished "HS only" from "lesional" TLE, but there was considerable overlap. Seizure freedom 2 years after surgery (Engel class 1) was similar: 67% ("HS only") vs 69% ("lesional" TLE). Neither presence of HS nor electro-clinical criteria was associated with surgical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite small differences in electrophysiological and clinical characteristics between MTLE with HS and lesional TLE, surgical outcomes are similar, indicating that aetiology seems irrelevant in the referral for temporal surgery.

摘要

目的

具有特定电生理和临床特征以及 MRI 上的海马硬化(HS)的内侧颞叶癫痫综合征(MTLE)被认为是手术预后良好的综合征原型。已经发现 MTLE 的发作起始区延伸到海马体之外,并且新皮层发作通常涉及内侧结构。因此,可以质疑 HS 伴 MTLE 是否在电临床特征和手术预后方面与病变性颞叶癫痫不同。我们评估了 HS 伴 MTLE 是否与病变性 TLE 有区别,以及哪些标准决定手术结果。

方法

我们对 389 名 MRI 异常患者进行回顾性队列研究,这些患者接受了颞叶切除术,他们被分为“仅 HS”或“病变性 TLE”。有 26 人存在双重病变,因此被排除在进一步分析之外。我们比较了手术结果和电临床特征。

结果

超过一半(61%)的患者为“仅 HS”。有四个电临床特征(癫痫发作年龄、热性惊厥、记忆功能障碍和对侧扭转性姿势)可以将“仅 HS”与“病变性 TLE”区分开来,但存在相当大的重叠。术后 2 年无发作(Engel 分级 1)的比例相似:67%(“仅 HS”)与 69%(“病变性 TLE”)。HS 的存在或电临床标准均与手术结果无关。

结论

尽管 HS 伴 MTLE 和病变性 TLE 之间在电生理和临床特征上存在细微差异,但手术结果相似,这表明病因在颞叶手术的转诊中似乎并不重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验