Jing Zhang, Muheremu Aikeremujiang, Liu Pengfei, Hu Xiaoyun, Binjiang Zhao
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
2 Department of Spine Surgery, Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China.
J Int Med Res. 2017 Dec;45(6):2072-2077. doi: 10.1177/0300060517711085. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
Objective To compare the clinical pharmacokinetics of rocuronium when applied according to fat-free mass versus real body weight during anesthetic induction of patients with lymphedema. Methods Sixty patients with lymphedema (age, 18-60 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, I-II) undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Rocuronium was administered based on the fat-free mass in 30 patients and real body weight in 30 patients. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil by target-controlled infusion. Intubation was attempted when the onset time (T1) (time from end of bolus injection to 100% twitch depression) reached maximal inhibition, and respiratory support with mechanical ventilation was then applied. The T1, clinical duration (time from end of bolus injection to recovery of twitch tension to 25% of control), recovery index (time from 25% to 75% of recovery of T1), and dosage were recorded. Results Complete data were recorded for 59 patients, and there were no significant differences in the general condition, intubation condition, or median duration of action of rocuronium between the two groups. However, the median T1, recovery index, and dosage of rocuronium were significantly different. Conclusion Good intubation conditions and a shortened clinical duration can be obtained for patients with lymphedema when induction with rocuronium is based on the fat-free mass.
目的 比较在淋巴水肿患者麻醉诱导期间,根据去脂体重与实际体重应用罗库溴铵时的临床药代动力学。方法 将60例接受全身麻醉择期手术的淋巴水肿患者(年龄18 - 60岁;美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级,I - II级)随机分为两组。30例患者根据去脂体重给予罗库溴铵,30例患者根据实际体重给予罗库溴铵。采用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注诱导全身麻醉。当起效时间(T1)(从单次推注结束至颤搐抑制达100%的时间)达到最大抑制时尝试插管,然后应用机械通气进行呼吸支持。记录T1、临床作用持续时间(从单次推注结束至颤搐张力恢复至对照值的25%的时间)、恢复指数(从T1恢复的25%至75%的时间)和剂量。结果 59例患者记录了完整数据,两组患者的一般状况、插管条件或罗库溴铵的中位作用持续时间无显著差异。然而,罗库溴铵的中位T1、恢复指数和剂量有显著差异。结论 对于淋巴水肿患者,以去脂体重为基础用罗库溴铵诱导麻醉时,可获得良好的插管条件并缩短临床作用持续时间。