• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同管理体制下医院运营效率的评估与比较

[Assessment and comparison of hospital operating efficiency under different management systems].

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Jun 18;49(3):483-488.

PMID:28628151
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess and analyze the operation efficiency of 8 commission general public hospitals managed directly by National Health and Family Planning Commission and 8 municipal general hospitals managed directly by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals in Beijing and to provide suggestions on improving service capacity and designing relevant health policy.

METHODS

Input and output data of 8 commission hospitals and 8 municipal hospitals were obtained from Beijing Direct-Reported Health Statistics data from 2011 to 2014. Data envelopment analysis was used as the hospital operation efficiency measurement tool. The CCR and BCC models were built to calculate technical efficiency (TE), pure technical efficiency (PTE), scale efficiency (SE) and the status of scale efficiency of 16 hospitals in 2011 and 2014; the Malmquist index model was built to analyze the total factor productivity change (TFPC), technological change (TC), technical efficiency change, pure technical efficiency change and scale efficiency change of the 16 hospitals from 2011 to 2014.

RESULTS

In 2011, the TE, PTE and SE of the commission hospitals were higher than those of the municipal hospitals, and the TEs of the commission hospitals and the municipal hospitals were 0.918 and 0.873 respectively. In 2014, the TE, PTE and SE of commission hospitals were lower than those of the municipal hospitals, and the TE of the commission hospitals and the municipal hospitals were 0.906 and 0.951, respectively, which was contrary to the results in 2011. According to the Malmquist index model, the average of TFPC of the municipal hospitals was larger than that of the commission hospitals, the former increased 5.9% and the latter increased 2.8% per year; the average of TC was greater than the one in both the municipal hospitals and the commission hospitals, with a growth of 3.2% and 2.9% per year, respectively; the average growth of PTE in the commission hospitals was lower than that of the municipal hospitals, and the average descent of SE in the commission hospitals was larger than that in the municipal hospitals.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in the operation efficiency between different management systems and the main factors associated with operation efficiency are the technological and management level. Given scale efficiency status and macroeconomic medical policies, the commission hospitals and the municipal hospitals require further adjusting the distribution of medical resources, and it is of great significance for all the commission hospitals and the municipal hospitals to improve the management level and resource integration capability.

摘要

目的

评估与分析国家卫生和计划生育委员会直属的8家委管公立医院以及北京市医院管理局直属的8家市属公立医院的运行效率,并为提高服务能力及制定相关卫生政策提供建议。

方法

获取2011年至2014年北京市直报卫生统计数据中8家委管医院和8家市属医院的投入与产出数据。采用数据包络分析作为医院运行效率测量工具。构建CCR和BCC模型,计算2011年和2014年16家医院的技术效率(TE)、纯技术效率(PTE)、规模效率(SE)以及规模效率状况;构建Malmquist指数模型,分析2011年至2014年16家医院的全要素生产率变化(TFPC)、技术变化(TC)、技术效率变化、纯技术效率变化和规模效率变化。

结果

2011年,委管医院的TE、PTE和SE高于市属医院,委管医院和市属医院的TE分别为0.918和0.873。2014年,委管医院的TE、PTE和SE低于市属医院,委管医院和市属医院的TE分别为0.906和0.951,与2011年结果相反。根据Malmquist指数模型,市属医院的TFPC平均值大于委管医院,前者每年增长5.9%,后者每年增长2.8%;TC平均值大于市属医院和委管医院,分别每年增长3.2%和2.9%;委管医院PTE的平均增长低于市属医院,委管医院SE的平均下降幅度大于市属医院。

结论

不同管理体制下医院运行效率存在显著差异,与运行效率相关的主要因素是技术和管理水平。鉴于规模效率状况及宏观经济医疗政策,委管医院和市属医院均需进一步调整医疗资源配置,提高管理水平和资源整合能力对所有委管医院和市属医院具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
[Assessment and comparison of hospital operating efficiency under different management systems].不同管理体制下医院运营效率的评估与比较
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Jun 18;49(3):483-488.
2
Bootstrapping data envelopment analysis of efficiency and productivity of county public hospitals in Eastern, Central, and Western China after the public hospital reform.公立医院改革后中国东部、中部和西部县级公立医院效率与生产率的数据包络分析自展法
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2017 Oct;37(5):681-692. doi: 10.1007/s11596-017-1789-6. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
3
Efficiency and productivity measurement of rural township hospitals in China: a bootstrapping data envelopment analysis.中国乡镇卫生院效率与生产率测量:基于自抽样数据包络分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 11;6(11):e011911. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011911.
4
Efficiency of health resource utilisation in primary-level maternal and child health hospitals in Shanxi Province, China: a bootstrapping data envelopment analysis and truncated regression approach.中国山西省基层妇幼保健院卫生资源利用效率:bootstrap 数据包络分析和截断回归方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5032-y.
5
[Study on the efficiency of tertiary public hospitals and its influencing factors in Beijing].[北京市三级公立医院效率及其影响因素研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Jun 18;50(3):408-415.
6
The Efficiency Evaluation of Municipal-Level Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals Using Data Envelopment Analysis After the Implementation of Hierarchical Medical Treatment Policy in Gansu Province, China.中国甘肃省实施分级诊疗政策后基于数据包络分析的市级中医医院效率评价
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221095799. doi: 10.1177/00469580221095799.
7
[Assessment of research efficiency of critical care medicine in hospitals affiliated S university based on data envelopment method: taking the 13th Five-Year Plan period as an example].基于数据包络法对S大学附属医院重症医学科研效率的评估:以“十三五”时期为例
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Mar;34(3):294-300. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20220112-00050.
8
Evaluation of performance and impacts of maternal and child health hospital services using Data Envelopment Analysis in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China: a comparison study among poverty and non-poverty county level hospitals.运用数据包络分析法对中国广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院服务的绩效与影响进行评估:贫困与非贫困县级医院的比较研究
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 23;15(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0420-y.
9
Measuring Productivity and Relative Efficiency of Public Tertiary Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals in Hubei, China.测量中国湖北省公立三级中医医院的生产力和相对效率。
Inquiry. 2023 Jan-Dec;60:469580231190576. doi: 10.1177/00469580231190576.
10
Technical Efficiency of Public and Private Hospitals in Beijing, China: A Comparative Study.中国北京公立医院与私立医院的技术效率:比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):82. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010082.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficiency Comparison of Public Hospitals under Different Administrative Affiliations in China: A Pilot City Case.中国不同行政隶属关系下公立医院效率比较:以某试点城市为例
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;9(4):437. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9040437.