生活方式干预策略对精神病患者体重影响的比较疗效：一项系统评价和网状Meta分析方案
Comparative efficacy of lifestyle intervention strategies on weight outcomes in people with psychosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol.
作者信息
Mucheru Doreen W, Hanlon Mary-Claire, McEvoy Mark, MacDonald-Wicks Lesley
机构信息
1School of Health Sciences, Faculty Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia 2Brain and Mental Health Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, Australia 3Priority Research Centre for Brain and Mental Health, Mater Hospital, Waratah, Australia 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia 5Hunter Cancer Research Alliance, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia 6School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia 7Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, Australia 8Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia 9The University of Newcastle Centre for Evidence Based Healthcare Informing Research (CEBHIR): a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, Callaghan, Australia.
出版信息
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Jun;15(6):1593-1601. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003121.
REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:: (i) To systematically review and rank the efficacy of different types of lifestyle intervention strategies on weight outcomes (weight, body mass index [BMI], waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio) in people with psychosis. (The efficacy of different types of lifestyle intervention strategies will be ranked by comparing the effect size on weight outcomes in people with psychotic disorders.) (ii) To stratify lifestyle interventions that target weight outcomes (weight, BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio) in people with psychosis, according to their inclusion of dietary information that adheres with Australian Dietary Guidelines (National Health and Medical Research Council. Eat for Health, Australian Dietary Guidelines Canberra National Health and Medical Research Council; 2013).Specifically, the review question is: What lifestyle intervention strategies targeting weight outcomes (weight, BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio) in people with psychosis compared to no treatment or various control conditions have the best efficacy?
综述问题/目标：(i) 系统回顾并对不同类型的生活方式干预策略对精神病患者体重结果（体重、体重指数[BMI]、腰围和腰臀比）的疗效进行排名。（通过比较对精神病性障碍患者体重结果的效应大小来对不同类型的生活方式干预策略的疗效进行排名。）(ii) 根据针对精神病患者体重结果（体重、BMI、腰围和腰臀比）的生活方式干预措施中是否包含符合澳大利亚饮食指南（国家卫生与医学研究委员会。为健康饮食，澳大利亚饮食指南，堪培拉，国家卫生与医学研究委员会；2013年）的饮食信息，对这些干预措施进行分层。具体而言，综述问题是：与未治疗或各种对照条件相比，针对精神病患者体重结果（体重、BMI、腰围和腰臀比）的哪些生活方式干预策略具有最佳疗效？
Zotero 插件