• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究。

Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score-matched study.

作者信息

Liu Rong, Liu Qu, Zhao Zhi-Ming, Tan Xiang-Long, Gao Yuan-Xing, Zhao Guo-Dong

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgical Oncology, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Department of General Surgery, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(4):461-469. doi: 10.1002/jso.24676. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1002/jso.24676
PMID:28628713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) is considered a safe and feasible alternative to laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). However, previous studies have some limitations including small sample size and selection bias. This study aimed to evaluate whether the robotic approach has advantages over laparoscopic surgery in distal pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Demographics and perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing RDP (n = 102) and LDP (n = 102) between January 2011 and December 2015 were reviewed. A 1:1 propensity score matched analysis was performed between both groups.

RESULTS

Both groups displayed no significant differences in perioperative outcomes including operative time, blood loss, transfusion rate, and rates of overall morbidities and pancreatic fistula. Robotic approach reduced the rate of conversion to laparotomy (2.9% vs 9.8%, P = 0.045), especially in patients with large tumors (0% vs 22.2%, P = 0.042). RDP improved spleen (SP) and splenic vessels preservation (SVP) rates in patients with moderate tumors (60.0% vs 35.5%, P = 0.047; 37.1% vs 12.9%, P = 0.025), especially in patients without malignancy (95.5% vs 52.4%, P = 0.001; 59.1% vs 19.0%, P = 0.007). RDP also reduced postoperative hospital stay (PHS) significantly (7.67% vs 8.58, P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

RDP is associated with less rate of conversion to laparotomy, shorter PHS, and improved SP and SVP rates in selected patients than LDP.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(RDP)被认为是腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)的一种安全可行的替代方法。然而,以往的研究存在一些局限性,包括样本量小和选择偏倚。本研究旨在评估机器人手术在远端胰腺切除术中是否比腹腔镜手术具有优势。

方法

回顾了2011年1月至2015年12月期间接受RDP(n = 102)和LDP(n = 102)的患者的人口统计学和围手术期结果。两组之间进行了1:1倾向评分匹配分析。

结果

两组在围手术期结果方面无显著差异,包括手术时间、失血量、输血率以及总体并发症和胰瘘发生率。机器人手术方法降低了中转开腹率(2.9%对9.8%,P = 0.045),尤其是在肿瘤较大的患者中(0%对22.2%,P = 0.042)。RDP提高了中度肿瘤患者的脾脏(SP)和脾血管保留(SVP)率(60.0%对35.5%,P = 0.047;37.1%对12.9%,P = 0.025),尤其是在无恶性肿瘤的患者中(95.5%对52.4%,P = 0.001;59.1%对19.0%,P = 0.007)。RDP还显著缩短了术后住院时间(PHS)(7.67天对8.58天,P = 0.032)。

结论

与LDP相比,RDP在特定患者中转开腹率更低、PHS更短,且SP和SVP率更高。

相似文献

1
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score-matched study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;116(4):461-469. doi: 10.1002/jso.24676. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
2
Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.机器人手术方式提高了腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的脾脏保留率并缩短了术后住院时间:一项配对队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3507-18. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4101-5. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
3
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for PNETs: laparoscopic or robotic approach?胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的微创远端胰腺切除术:腹腔镜手术还是机器人手术?
Oncotarget. 2017 May 16;8(20):33872-33883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17513.
4
[Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study].[机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术:一项回顾性单中心研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Feb 1;57(2):102-107. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.02.006.
5
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant pancreatic lesions.机器人辅助与腹腔镜下远端胰腺切除术治疗胰腺良恶性病变的系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4078-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4723-7. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
Robotic-Assisted Approach Improves Vessel Preservation in Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy.机器人辅助方法改善保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术中的血管保留
Dig Surg. 2016;33(5):406-13. doi: 10.1159/000444269. Epub 2016 May 4.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.
9
Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助胰体尾切除术的术后结果和费用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2095-2105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10728-8. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:法国单中心前瞻性经验及成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic vs laparoscopic approaches of pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胰腺切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 16;19(1):295. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02446-7.
2
A comprehensive analysis of robotic assisted vs. laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using propensity score matching.使用倾向评分匹配对机器人辅助与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术进行综合分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Feb 27;19(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02249-w.
3
An evidence-based model for predicting conversion to open surgery in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.
基于证据的微创远端胰腺切除术中转开腹手术预测模型。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6423-6436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11216-9. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
4
Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.比较机器人和腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的肿瘤学和手术结果:倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5678-5685. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11147-5. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
5
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted versus open surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助手术与开放手术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 22;18(1):288. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02046-x.
6
Study International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR): Does Surgical Approach Matter?国际多中心胰腺左半切除术研究(SIMPLR):手术方式重要吗?
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 5;16(5):1051. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051051.
7
Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助胰体尾切除术的术后结果和费用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2095-2105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10728-8. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
8
Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review.微创外科在局限性胰腺导管腺癌治疗中的作用:综述。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 22;18(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01825-w.
9
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023.《2023年机器人胰腺手术国际共识指南》
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):89-104. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-132. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
10
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic versus open radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.机器人与开放根治性顺行模块化胰脾切除术的短期和长期结果:回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1316-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10635-4. Epub 2023 Dec 18.