Department of Clinical Psychology,University of Bergen,Bergen,Norway.
Department of Psychosocial Science,University of Bergen,Bergen,Norway.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Oct;29(10):1647-1656. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217001004. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Due to previously reported mixed findings, there is a need for further empirical research on the factorial structure of the commonly used Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI). Therefore, the psychometric properties of the GAI and its short form version (GAI-SF) were evaluated in a psychogeriatric mixed in-and-out patient sample (n = 543).
Unidimensionality was tested using a bifactor analysis. Rasch modeling was used to assess scale properties. Sex, cognitive functioning and depressive symptoms were tested for differential item functioning (DIF).
The bifactor analysis identified an essential unidimensional (general) factor structure but also specific local factors. The general factor comprises all the 20 items as one factor, and the results showed that the variance in the general and specific factors (subscale) scores is best explained by the single general factor. These findings were demonstrated for both versions of the GAI. Furthermore, the Rasch models identified extensive item overlap, indicating redundant items in the full version of the GAI. The GAI-SF also seems to extract much of the same information as the full form. Test scores and items have the same meaning for older adults across different demographic status.
The findings support the use of a total sum score for both GAI and GAI-SF. Notably, when using the GAI-SF, no information is lost, in comparison with the full scale, thus, supporting the option of choosing the short form (version) when considered most appropriate in demanding clinical contexts.
由于先前报道的结果存在差异,因此需要进一步进行实证研究,以确定常用老年焦虑量表(GAI)的因子结构。因此,在精神老年混合门诊和住院患者样本(n=543)中,评估了 GAI 及其简短形式版本(GAI-SF)的心理测量特性。
使用双因素分析测试单维性。使用 Rasch 模型评估量表特性。测试性别、认知功能和抑郁症状是否存在差异项目功能(DIF)。
双因素分析确定了一个基本的单维(总体)因子结构,但也确定了特定的局部因子。总体因子包含所有 20 个项目作为一个因子,结果表明,一般和特定因子(子量表)分数的方差最好由单个一般因子来解释。这些发现适用于 GAI 的两个版本。此外,Rasch 模型确定了广泛的项目重叠,表明 GAI 完整版本中的项目存在冗余。GAI-SF 似乎也提取了与完整形式相同的大部分信息。在不同人口统计学状态下,测试分数和项目对老年人具有相同的含义。
这些发现支持使用 GAI 和 GAI-SF 的总分。值得注意的是,与完整量表相比,使用 GAI-SF 时不会丢失信息,因此,在需要的临床环境中,选择简短形式(版本)是一个更合适的选择。