• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

道德学习:心理学与哲学视角

Moral learning: Psychological and philosophical perspectives.

作者信息

Cushman Fiery, Kumar Victor, Railton Peter

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, United States.

Department of Philosophy, Boston University, United States.

出版信息

Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.008
PMID:28629599
Abstract

The past 15years occasioned an extraordinary blossoming of research into the cognitive and affective mechanisms that support moral judgment and behavior. This growth in our understanding of moral mechanisms overshadowed a crucial and complementary question, however: How are they learned? As this special issue of the journal Cognition attests, a new crop of research into moral learning has now firmly taken root. This new literature draws on recent advances in formal methods developed in other domains, such as Bayesian inference, reinforcement learning and other machine learning techniques. Meanwhile, it also demonstrates how learning and deciding in a social domain-and especially in the moral domain-sometimes involves specialized cognitive systems. We review the contributions to this special issue and situate them within the broader contemporary literature. Our review focuses on how we learn moral values and moral rules, how we learn about personal moral character and relationships, and the philosophical implications of these emerging models.

摘要

在过去的15年里,对支持道德判断和行为的认知与情感机制的研究蓬勃发展。然而,我们对道德机制理解的这种增长掩盖了一个关键且互补的问题:它们是如何习得的?正如《认知》杂志的这一特刊所证明的,一批关于道德学习的新研究现已牢固扎根。这一新的文献借鉴了其他领域所开发的形式方法的最新进展,如贝叶斯推理、强化学习和其他机器学习技术。与此同时,它还展示了在社会领域——尤其是在道德领域——的学习和决策有时涉及专门的认知系统。我们回顾了对这一特刊的贡献,并将它们置于更广泛的当代文献之中。我们的综述重点关注我们如何学习道德价值观和道德规则,如何了解个人的道德品质和人际关系,以及这些新兴模型的哲学含义。

相似文献

1
Moral learning: Psychological and philosophical perspectives.道德学习:心理学与哲学视角
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
Finding faults: how moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure.发现错误:道德困境如何阐明认知结构。
Soc Neurosci. 2012;7(3):269-79. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.614000. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
3
Learning a commonsense moral theory.学习一种常识性道德理论。
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
Moral Learning: Conceptual foundations and normative relevance.道德学习:概念基础与规范相关性
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:172-190. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Moral cognition in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中的道德认知。
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2014;19(6):495-508. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2014.928195. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
A person-centered approach to moral judgment.一种以人为本的道德判断方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):72-81. doi: 10.1177/1745691614556679.
7
Can model-free reinforcement learning explain deontological moral judgments?无模型强化学习能否解释道义论道德判断?
Cognition. 2016 May;150:232-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.道德判断中认知冲突与控制的神经基础。
Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):389-400. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027.
9
Moral vindications.道德辩护
Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Why are nonprototypical events so difficult, and what are the implications for social-developmental psychology?为什么非典型事件如此难以理解,这对社会发展心理学又有什么影响呢?
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1991;56(2):104-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.1991.tb01172.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Human newborns spontaneously attend to prosocial interactions.人类新生儿会自发关注亲社会互动。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 8;16(1):6304. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61517-3.
2
Moral decision-making 'on the fly'.即时道德决策。
Psychol Res. 2025 May 8;89(3):98. doi: 10.1007/s00426-025-02126-z.
3
Distinguishing fast change in social norms and slow change in personal norms in cooperative decision-making.在合作决策中区分社会规范的快速变化和个人规范的缓慢变化。
Front Psychol. 2024 May 30;15:1380341. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1380341. eCollection 2024.
4
Evolution of norms for judging social behavior.评判社会行为规范的演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 13;120(24):e2219480120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2219480120. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Model-free decision making is prioritized when learning to avoid harming others.在学习避免伤害他人时,优先考虑无模型决策。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 3;117(44):27719-27730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010890117. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
6
Evolution of empathetic moral evaluation.同理心道德评价的演变。
Elife. 2019 Apr 9;8:e44269. doi: 10.7554/eLife.44269.