• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计实用性试验——我们能从经验教训中学到什么?

Designing pragmatic trials-what can we learn from lessons learned?

作者信息

Groenwold Rolf H H, Dekkers Olaf M

机构信息

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht 3584 CG, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Olof Palmes Allé 43-45, Aarhus DK-8200, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.006
PMID:28629700
Abstract

Pragmatic trials aim to inform clinical decision making by measuring the effect of a treatment in clinical practice. The purpose of the PRECIS-2 tool is to support in designing a truly pragmatic trial. We comment on a study by Forbes et al., who assessed the applicability of the PRECIS-2 tool. The tool will prove particularly useful when implemented in the process of trial design. However, it is yet unclear how e.g., possible dependencies between PRECIS domains, or conducting a pragmatic trial within an existing data registry (e.g., electronic health records) affect the applicability of the tool.

摘要

实用性试验旨在通过衡量一种治疗方法在临床实践中的效果来为临床决策提供依据。PRECIS-2工具的目的是支持设计真正的实用性试验。我们对福布斯等人的一项研究进行评论,他们评估了PRECIS-2工具的适用性。该工具在试验设计过程中实施时将证明特别有用。然而,目前尚不清楚例如PRECIS各领域之间可能的相互依存关系,或在现有数据登记系统(如电子健康记录)内进行实用性试验如何影响该工具的适用性。

相似文献

1
Designing pragmatic trials-what can we learn from lessons learned?设计实用性试验——我们能从经验教训中学到什么?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
2
Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains.构建对话:使用PRECIS-2评分来促进对实用试验设计领域的理解。
Trials. 2017 Nov 10;18(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2267-y.
3
Understanding the applicability of results from primary care trials: lessons learned from applying PRECIS-2.理解初级保健试验结果的适用性:应用PRECIS-2的经验教训。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
4
[The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose].[PRECIS-2工具:设计符合目的的试验]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 10;39(2):222-226. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.02.017.
5
A dynamic application of PRECIS-2 to evaluate implementation in a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial in two nursing home systems.在两个养老院系统的一项实用、整群随机临床试验中,对PRECIS-2进行动态应用以评估实施情况。
Trials. 2018 Aug 22;19(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2817-y.
6
Using the Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS) model in clinical research: Application to refine a practice-based research network (PBRN) study.在临床研究中使用务实-解释性连续体指标总结(PRECIS)模型:应用于完善基于实践的研究网络(PBRN)研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(6):846-54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140042.
7
Improving the relevance of randomised trials to primary care: a qualitative study investigating views towards pragmatic trials and the PRECIS-2 tool.提高随机试验与初级保健的相关性:一项关于对实用试验和PRECIS-2工具看法的定性研究
Trials. 2019 Dec 11;20(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3812-7.
8
Pragmatic vs. explanatory: an adaptation of the PRECIS tool helps to judge the applicability of systematic reviews for daily practice.务实与解释:PRECIS 工具的改编有助于判断系统评价对日常实践的适用性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.020. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
9
The PRECIS-2 tool seems not to be useful to discriminate the degree of pragmatism of medicine masked trials from that of open-label trials.PRECIS-2 工具似乎无法区分掩蔽试验和开放标签试验的实用主义程度。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr;77(4):539-546. doi: 10.1007/s00228-020-03030-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
10
Real-world evidence: How pragmatic are randomized controlled trials labeled as pragmatic?真实世界证据:被标记为实用的随机对照试验有多么实用?
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 3;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1038-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving health equity through health care systems research.通过医疗体系研究提高卫生公平性。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):289-299. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14192.
2
Smoking is associated with a higher risk of unplanned medical visits among adult patients with diabetes, using retrospective electronic medical record data from 2014 to 2016.利用2014年至2016年的回顾性电子病历数据发现,吸烟与成年糖尿病患者计划外就医的较高风险相关。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 6;20(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05277-4.
3
Pragmatic Trials in Genomic Medicine: The Integrating Pharmacogenetics In Clinical Care (I-PICC) Study.
基因组医学中的实用临床试验:整合药物基因组学于临床照护(I-PICC)研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar;13(2):381-390. doi: 10.1111/cts.12723. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
4
A prospective cohort and extended comprehensive-cohort design provided insights about the generalizability of a pragmatic trial: the ProtecT prostate cancer trial.前瞻性队列和扩展综合队列设计为了解一项实用试验(即 ProtecT 前列腺癌试验)的普遍性提供了一些见解。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.019. Epub 2017 Dec 27.