Mao Dominic, Grogan Dennis W
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
J Bacteriol. 2017 Aug 8;199(17). doi: 10.1128/JB.00177-17. Print 2017 Sep 1.
In order to analyze in molecular terms how genomes diverge, damage-induced mutations and natural polymorphisms (PMs) were identified in laboratory constructs and wild-type isolates, respectively, of Among wild-type isolates drawn from one local population, pairwise nucleotide divergence averaged 4 × 10, which is about 0.15% of the corresponding divergence reported for The most variable features of wild-type genomes were homopolymer (mononucleotide) tracts and longer tandem repeats, consistent with the spontaneous mutations that occur under laboratory conditions. Natural isolates, however, also revealed large insertions/deletions and inversions, which did not occur in any of the laboratory-manipulated strains. Several of the large insertions/deletions could be attributed to the integration or excision of mobile genetic elements (MGEs), and each MGE represented a distinct system of site-specific recombination. The mode of recombination associated with one MGE, a provirus related to , was also seen in certain chromosomal inversions. Artificially induced mutations, non-MGE insertions/deletions, and small PMs exhibited different distributions over the genome, suggesting that large-scale patterning of genomes begins early in the divergence process. Unlike induced mutations, natural base pair substitutions occurred in clusters, and one cluster exhibited properties expected of nonreciprocal recombination (gene conversion) between dispersed imperfect repeats. Taken together, the results identify simple replication errors, slipped-strand events promoted by tandem repeats, homologous recombination, and rearrangements promoted by MGEs as the primary sources of genetic variation for this extremely acidophilic archaeon in its geothermal environment. The optimal growth temperatures of hyperthermophilic archaea accelerate DNA decomposition, which is expected to make DNA repair especially important for their genetic stability, yet these archaea lack certain broadly conserved types of DNA repair proteins. In this study, the genome of the extreme thermoacidophile was found to be remarkably stable, accumulating few mutations in many (though not all) laboratory manipulations and in natural populations. Furthermore, all the genetic processes that were inferred to diversify these genomes also operate in mesophilic bacteria and eukaryotes. This suggests that a common set of mechanisms produces most of the genetic variation in all microorganisms, despite the fundamental differences in physiology, DNA repair systems, and genome structure represented in the three domains of life.
为了从分子层面分析基因组如何发生分化,分别在实验室构建体和野生型分离株中鉴定了损伤诱导的突变和自然多态性(PMs)。在从一个本地种群中获取的野生型分离株中,成对核苷酸差异平均为4×10,这约为所报道的相应差异的0.15%。野生型基因组中最可变的特征是同聚物(单核苷酸)序列和较长的串联重复序列,这与实验室条件下发生的自发突变一致。然而,自然分离株还显示出大的插入/缺失和倒位,这些在任何实验室操作的菌株中都未出现。一些大的插入/缺失可归因于移动遗传元件(MGEs)的整合或切除,并且每个MGE代表一个独特的位点特异性重组系统。与一种MGE(一种与相关的前病毒)相关的重组模式也在某些染色体倒位中出现。人工诱导的突变、非MGE插入/缺失和小的PMs在基因组上呈现不同的分布,这表明基因组的大规模模式在分化过程早期就开始了。与诱导突变不同,自然碱基对替换成簇出现,并且一个簇表现出分散的不完全重复序列之间非相互重组(基因转换)所预期的特性。综合来看,这些结果确定简单的复制错误、串联重复序列促进的滑链事件、同源重组以及MGEs促进的重排是这种极端嗜酸性古菌在其地热环境中遗传变异的主要来源。超嗜热古菌的最佳生长温度会加速DNA分解,这预计会使DNA修复对其遗传稳定性尤为重要,然而这些古菌缺乏某些广泛保守的DNA修复蛋白类型。在本研究中,发现极端嗜热嗜酸菌的基因组非常稳定,在许多(尽管不是全部)实验室操作和自然种群中积累的突变很少。此外,所有推断会使这些基因组多样化的遗传过程也在嗜温细菌和真核生物中起作用。这表明尽管生命的三个域在生理学、DNA修复系统和基因组结构上存在根本差异,但一组共同的机制产生了所有微生物中的大部分遗传变异。