Ferreri Stefanie P, Cross L Brian, Hanes Scott D, Jenkins Tara, Meyer Douglas, Pittenger Amy
UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Bill Gatton College of Pharmacy, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):63. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81463.
To evaluate the talents of fellows from cohorts 1-10 of the Academic Leadership Fellows Program (ALFP). This was a descriptive analysis of previously collected ALFP cohort data reflecting the talents using the Clifton StrengthsFinder assessment tool. Data consisted of 295 fellows from the first 10 years of the ALFP program. The Clifton StrengthsFinder talents were aggregated and analyzed to determine talents (strengths) distribution and domain. The aggregate of the four domains were compared among ALFP fellows using a chi-square analysis with an a priori alpha of .05. Lowest frequency of talents was found in the influencing domain (11.2%), while the domains with the largest frequency of talents were strategic thinking (34.4%) and executing (31.1%). When looking at the specific talents within the domains among the ALFP fellows, achiever (in the executing domain) and learner (in the strategic thinking domain) were the most frequent talents, while command (in the influencing domain) and adaptability (in the relationship building domain) were the least frequent talents. Since the profession is deficient in the influencing and relationship building domains (command and adaptability talents, respectively), this could help explain our slow progress in moving the profession from a product-focused role to a provider-based role. Perhaps the profession should be using a strategy better aligned with our signature leadership domains of executing and strategic thinking and focus on being a member of the health care team by aligning with team-based care rather than obtaining provider status.
评估学术领导力研究员项目（ALFP）第1至10期学员的才能。这是一项对先前收集的ALFP学员数据的描述性分析，这些数据使用克利夫顿优势识别器评估工具反映了学员的才能。数据包括ALFP项目前10年的295名学员。对克利夫顿优势识别器所确定的才能进行汇总和分析，以确定才能（优势）的分布和领域。使用先验α值为0.05的卡方分析对ALFP学员中四个领域的汇总情况进行比较。发现影响领域的才能出现频率最低（11.2%），而才能出现频率最高的领域是战略思维（34.4%）和执行（31.1%）。在查看ALFP学员各领域内的具体才能时，成就者（在执行领域）和学习者（在战略思维领域）是出现频率最高的才能，而指挥（在影响领域）和适应能力（在关系建立领域）是出现频率最低的才能。由于该行业在影响和关系建立领域（分别对应指挥和适应能力才能）存在不足，这可能有助于解释我们在将该行业从以产品为中心的角色转变为以提供者为基础的角色方面进展缓慢的原因。也许该行业应该采用一种与我们标志性的执行和战略思维领导领域更一致的策略，通过与基于团队的护理保持一致，专注于成为医疗团队的一员，而不是获取提供者身份。
