• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Narratives of Essentialism and Exceptionalism: The Challenges and Possibilities of Using Human Rights to Improve Access to Safe Abortion.

作者信息

Yamin Alicia Ely, Bergallo Paola

机构信息

A visiting professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center and director of the Health and Human Rights Initiative at the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law; adjunct lecturer on law and global health at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health; a global fellow at the Centre on Law and Social Transformation. She currently serves as a commissioner on the Lancet-O'Neill Institute Commission on Global Health and the Law and the Independent Accountability Panel for the UN Secretary-General's Global Strategy for Women's, Children's, and Adolescents' Health.

An associate professor of law at the Escuela de Derecho, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina; an adjunct researcher at the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas of Argentina; and a global fellow at the Centre on Law and Social Transformation.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):1-11.

PMID:28630537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5473034/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/5473034/7daf82e2f4cc/hhr-19-001-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/5473034/7daf82e2f4cc/hhr-19-001-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1818/5473034/7daf82e2f4cc/hhr-19-001-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Narratives of Essentialism and Exceptionalism: The Challenges and Possibilities of Using Human Rights to Improve Access to Safe Abortion.本质主义与例外论叙事：利用人权改善安全堕胎可及性的挑战与可能性
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):1-11.
2
The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.美国堕胎服务的经济状况：对政府堕胎资金的限制是罗诉韦德案裁决后（美国堕胎权利斗争的）战场。
Conscience. 2005;26(4):11-5.
3
Abortion in the United States: barriers to access.美国的堕胎情况：获取堕胎服务的障碍
Health Hum Rights. 2000;4(2):174-94.
4
Abortion-rights groups look to 1998.
Natl J (Wash). 1998 Jan 3;30(1):28-9.
5
Abortion providers bounce back.
Natl J (Wash). 1996 Jul 20;28(29-30):1584-6.
6
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt and the Current Implications for Abortion Access.全女性健康组织诉赫勒斯泰特案及其对堕胎权获取的当前影响。
Birth. 2017 Mar;44(1):3-6. doi: 10.1111/birt.12271. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
US activists from both sides of abortion debate rally in Washington.
BMJ. 2017 Feb 1;356:j553. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j553.
8
My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding.我的身体，我的同意：保障堕胎资金的宪法权利。
Albany Law Rev. 1999;62(3):1057-1118.
9
An expansion of Right to Choose v. Byrne: public funding for abortions for those buying insurance under the new Health Care Bill.“选择权诉伯恩案”的扩展：为那些根据新医保法案购买保险的人提供堕胎的公共资金。
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2012;42(4):1679-712.
10
What really happened at Cairo.开罗究竟发生了什么事。
First Things. 1995 Feb;50:24-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-marital Pregnancies and Unmarried Women's Search for Illegal Abortion in Morocco.摩洛哥的非婚姻怀孕和未婚女性寻求非法堕胎。
Health Hum Rights. 2019 Dec;21(2):33-45.
2
Advocating safe abortion: outcomes of a multi-country needs assessment on the potential role of national societies of obstetrics and gynecology.倡导安全流产：多国需求评估中关于妇产科国家学会潜在作用的结果。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;148(3):282-289. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13092. Epub 2020 Jan 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical abortion can be provided safely and effectively by pharmacy workers trained within a harm reduction framework: Nepal.在减少伤害框架下接受培训的药剂师能够安全有效地提供药物流产服务：尼泊尔。
Contraception. 2018 Feb;97(2):137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends.2012年全球有意和意外怀孕情况及近期趋势。
Stud Fam Plann. 2014 Sep;45(3):301-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x.
3
From ideals to tools: applying human rights to maternal health.
从理想到工具：将人权应用于孕产妇健康。
PLoS Med. 2013 Nov;10(11):e1001546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001546. Epub 2013 Nov 5.