• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《都柏林孕产妇保健与反堕胎激进主义宣言》:来自拉丁美洲的实例

The Dublin Declaration on Maternal Health Care and Anti-Abortion Activism: Examples from Latin America.

作者信息

Morgan Lynn M

机构信息

Mary E. Woolley Professor of Anthropology at Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, MA, USA.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):41-53.

PMID:28630540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5473037/
Abstract

The Dublin Declaration on Maternal Healthcare-issued by self-declared pro-life activists in Ireland in 2012-states unequivocally that abortion is never medically necessary, even to save the life of a pregnant woman. This article examines the influence of the Dublin Declaration on abortion politics in Latin America, especially El Salvador and Chile, where it has recently been used in pro-life organizing to cast doubt on the notion that legalizing abortion will reduce maternal mortality. Its framers argue that legalizing abortion will not improve maternal mortality rates, but reproductive rights advocates respond that the Dublin Declaration is junk science designed to preserve the world's most restrictive abortion laws. Analyzing the strategy and impact of the Dublin Declaration brings to light one of the tactics used in anti-abortion organizing.

摘要

2012年,爱尔兰自称支持生命权的活动人士发布了《都柏林孕产妇保健宣言》,明确指出堕胎在医学上绝无必要,即便为挽救孕妇生命也不行。本文探讨了《都柏林宣言》对拉丁美洲堕胎政治的影响,尤其是萨尔瓦多和智利,近期该宣言被用于支持生命权的组织活动中,对堕胎合法化将降低孕产妇死亡率这一观念提出质疑。该宣言的起草者认为,堕胎合法化不会提高孕产妇死亡率,但生殖权利倡导者回应称,《都柏林宣言》是伪科学,旨在维护世界上最严格的堕胎法律。分析《都柏林宣言》的策略和影响揭示了反堕胎组织所采用的一种策略。

相似文献

1
The Dublin Declaration on Maternal Health Care and Anti-Abortion Activism: Examples from Latin America.《都柏林孕产妇保健与反堕胎激进主义宣言》:来自拉丁美洲的实例
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):41-53.
2
Reproductive rights: an international sample.生殖权利:一个国际样本。
Conscience. 1984 May-Jun;5(3):13-4.
3
Illegal abortion in Latin America.拉丁美洲的非法堕胎。
IPPF Med Bull. 1982 Aug;16(4):1-2.
4
78,000 women die each year from unsafe abortions worldwide. It is estimated that there are 20 million unsafe abortions per year on a global basis.全球每年有7.8万名妇女死于不安全堕胎。据估计,全球每年有2000万例不安全堕胎。
Reprod Freedom News. 1999 Mar;8(3):1, 5.
5
The risk of unwanted pregnancy, a Latin American perspective.意外怀孕的风险:拉丁美洲视角
IPPF Med Bull. 1989 Feb;23(1):1-3.
6
Illegal abortion in Latin America.拉丁美洲的非法堕胎
Draper Fund Rep. 1980 Oct(9):14-5.
7
The current status of abortion laws in Latin America: prospects and strategies for change.拉丁美洲堕胎法的现状:变革的前景与策略
J Law Med Ethics. 1993 Spring;21(1):67-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1993.tb01232.x.
8
[Induced abortion: a world perspective].[人工流产:全球视角]
Perspect Int Planif Fam. 1987(Spec No):12-6.
9
Planning for the next generation.为下一代做规划。
People Planet. 1992;1(3):24-5.
10
Virgin and martyr.贞女与殉道者。
Conscience. 1993 Spring-Summer;14(1-2):28-32.

引用本文的文献

1
The Zika virus: an opportunity to revisit reproductive health needs and disparities.寨卡病毒:重新审视生殖健康需求与差距的契机。
Germs. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):519-537. doi: 10.18683/germs.2022.1357. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Design and study of psychometric properties of the Community Attitude to Abortion Scale (CAAS) with the Chilean population: Autonomy and Stigma.智利人群对堕胎态度量表(CAAS)的心理测量学特性的设计与研究:自主性与污名化
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 23;13:1008492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008492. eCollection 2022.
3
Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.医学人类学学会就最高法院多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案的声明
Med Anthropol Q. 2022 Dec;36(4):433-441. doi: 10.1111/maq.12741. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
4
Conflicts Between Women's Religiosity and Sense of Free Will in the Context of Elective Abortion: A Qualitative Study in the Worst Period of Italy's COVID-19 Crisis.选择性堕胎背景下女性宗教信仰与自由意志感之间的冲突:意大利新冠疫情危机最严重时期的一项定性研究
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 2;12:619684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.619684. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Maternal Mortality Myth in the Context of Legalized Abortion.合法堕胎背景下的孕产妇死亡谬论
Linacre Q. 2013 Aug;80(3):264-276. doi: 10.1179/2050854913Y.0000000004. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
2
The Myth That Abortion is Safer Than Childbirth: Through the Looking Glass.堕胎比分娩更安全的谬论:透过镜子看真相。
Issues Law Med. 2015 Autumn;30(2):209-15.
3
Conservative litigation against sexual and reproductive health policies in Argentina.阿根廷针对性健康和生殖健康政策的保守派诉讼
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):82-90. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44805-5.
4
Abortion in Chile: the practice under a restrictive regime.智利的堕胎情况:在严格限制制度下的实际情况。
Reprod Health Matters. 2014 Nov;22(44):70-81. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44811-0.
5
The 'unexpected' Montevideo Consensus.“意外”的蒙得维的亚共识。
Glob Public Health. 2014;9(6):631-8. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.922596. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
Medical genetics and genetic counseling in Chile.智利的医学遗传学与遗传咨询
J Genet Couns. 2013 Dec;22(6):869-74. doi: 10.1007/s10897-013-9607-1. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
Termination of pregnancy as emergency obstetric care: the interpretation of Catholic health policy and the consequences for pregnant women: an analysis of the death of Savita Halappanavar in Ireland and similar cases.
Reprod Health Matters. 2013 May;21(41):9-17. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41711-1.
8
Fundamental discrepancies in abortion estimates and abortion-related mortality: A reevaluation of recent studies in Mexico with special reference to the International Classification of Diseases.堕胎估计数和与堕胎相关的死亡率之间的基本差异:对墨西哥最近的研究进行重新评估,特别参考《国际疾病分类》。
Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:613-23. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S38063. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
9
Women's education level, maternal health facilities, abortion legislation and maternal deaths: a natural experiment in Chile from 1957 to 2007.妇女受教育程度、孕产妇保健设施、堕胎立法和孕产妇死亡:1957 年至 2007 年智利的自然实验
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036613. Epub 2012 May 4.
10
Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.人工流产:1995 年至 2008 年全球发生率和趋势。
Lancet. 2012 Feb 18;379(9816):625-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61786-8. Epub 2012 Jan 19.