Dulskas Audrius, Kuliešius Žygimantas, Samalavičius Narimantas E
Department of Abdominal and General Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Clinic of Internal Diseases, Family Medicine and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University Vilnius, Lithuania.
Acta Med Litu. 2017;24(1):18-24. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v24i1.3459.
Laparoscopy or its combination with endoscopy is the next step for "difficult" polyps. The purpose of the paper was to review the outcomes of the laparoscopic approach to the management of "difficult" colorectal polyps. From 2006 to 2016, 58 patients who underwent laparoscopic treatment for "difficult" polyps that could not be treated by endoscopy at the National Cancer Institute, Lithuania, were included. The demographic data, the type of surgery, length of post-operative stay, complications, and final pathology were reviewed prospectively. The mean patient was 65.9 ± 8.9 years of age. Laparoscopic mobilization of the colonic segment and colotomy with removal of the polyp was performed in 15 (25.9%) patients, laparoscopic segmental bowel resection in 41 (70.7%) cases: anterior rectal resection with partial total mesorectal excision in 18 (31.0%), sigmoid resection in nine (15.5%), left hemicolectomy in seven (12.1%), right hemicolectomies in two (3.4%), ileocecal resection in two (3.4%), resection of transverse colon in two (3.4%), and sigmoid resection with transanal retrieval of specimen in one (1.7%). Two patients (3.4%) underwent laparoscopic-assisted endoscopic polypectomy. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 5.7 ± 2.4 days. There were four complications (6.9%). All patients recovered after conservative treatment. The mean polyp size was 3.5 ± 1.9 cm. Final histopathology revealed hyperplastic polyps ( = 2), tubular adenoma ( = 9), tubulovillous adenoma ( = 31), carcinoma in situ ( = 12), and invasive cancer ( = 4). For the management of endoscopically unresectable polyps, laparoscopic surgery is currently the technique of choice.
对于“困难”息肉,下一步可采用腹腔镜检查或其与内镜检查相结合的方法。本文的目的是回顾腹腔镜手术治疗“困难”结直肠息肉的效果。2006年至2016年,纳入了立陶宛国立癌症研究所58例因“困难”息肉接受腹腔镜治疗的患者,这些息肉无法通过内镜治疗。前瞻性地回顾了人口统计学数据、手术类型、术后住院时间、并发症及最终病理结果。患者平均年龄为65.9±8.9岁。15例(25.9%)患者行腹腔镜结肠段游离及息肉切除结肠切开术,41例(70.7%)行腹腔镜肠段切除术:18例(31.0%)行直肠前切除术加部分直肠系膜全切除术,9例(15.5%)行乙状结肠切除术,7例(12.1%)行左半结肠切除术,2例(3.4%)行右半结肠切除术,2例(3.4%)行回盲部切除术,2例(3.4%)行横结肠切除术,1例(1.7%)行乙状结肠切除术并经肛门取出标本。2例(3.4%)患者接受了腹腔镜辅助内镜息肉切除术。术后平均住院时间为5.7±2.4天。有4例并发症(6.9%)。所有患者经保守治疗后均康复。息肉平均大小为3.5±1.9cm。最终组织病理学检查显示增生性息肉(=2)、管状腺瘤(=9)、绒毛状管状腺瘤(=31)、原位癌(=12)和浸润性癌(=4)。对于内镜下无法切除的息肉,目前腹腔镜手术是首选技术。