Kopechek Jack, Bardales Cheryl, Lash A Todd, Walker Curtis, Pfeil Sheryl, Ledford Cynthia H
a Nationwide Children's Hospital , The Ohio State University College of Medicine , Columbus , Ohio , USA.
b Medicine Administration , The Ohio State University College of Medicine , Columbus , Ohio , USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):326-336. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1273781. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
Faculty coaching is recognized as an essential element for effective use of portfolios in undergraduate medical education, yet best practices for training these coaches are uncertain.
New portfolio coaches participated in a multifaceted training program that included orienting modules, a 7.5-hr training workshop featuring analysis of reflective writing, an Observed Structured Teaching Exercise (OSTE), and subsequent longitudinal coaches' meetings for timely task training. Four desired coaching skills were emphasized in the initial training: creating a safe environment, explicitly using performance data, asking questions that elicit reflection, and guiding the student to develop future goals and plans. We collected and analyzed several outcomes: (a) coaches' self-assessment at key intervals, (b) open-ended written responses to three coaching vignettes, (c) video recordings of the OSTE, and (d) subsequent student evaluation of the coach. In an attempt to capture learning from the workshop, both the responses to written vignettes and the video-recorded encounters were coded for presence or absence of the four desired skills.
Our portfolio and coaching program was instituted as part of a major undergraduate medical education reform. A new cohort of 25 coaches is enrolled with each matriculating student class, and each coach is assigned to work individually with 8-10 students, forming a coaching relationship that continues over 4 years. Coaches are compensated at 5% full-time equivalent.
On coach self-assessment, the majority of coaches reported significant improvement in their perceived ability to assess a student's level of reflection, enhance reflection, use performance data, and guide a student to develop goals and plans. After two semesters, coach perception of improved abilities persisted. Students rated coaches as excellent (82%), reporting that coaches created safe environments (99%), promoted insight (92%), and aided in goal setting (97%). Written responses to vignettes before the OSTE found that several coaches omitted desired behaviors; however, posttraining responses showed no discernable pattern of learning. Coding of the OSTE, in contrast, documented that all coaches demonstrated all four of the desired skills.
Although coaches reported learning related to key skills, learning was not apparent when responses to written vignettes were examined. In contrast, skills were demonstrated in the OSTE, perhaps due to the added structured tasks as well as anticipation of feedback. In conclusion, this portfolio coach training program achieved its desired aim of providing students with portfolio coaches who demonstrated the desired skills, as reported by both coaches and students.
教师指导被认为是本科医学教育中有效使用学习档案袋的关键要素,但培训这些指导教师的最佳实践尚不确定。
新的学习档案袋指导教师参加了一个多方面的培训项目,该项目包括入门模块、一个时长7.5小时的培训工作坊(其中有反思性写作分析)、一次观察性结构化教学练习(OSTE),以及随后为进行及时任务培训而召开的纵向指导教师会议。初始培训中强调了四种期望的指导技能:营造安全的环境、明确使用绩效数据、提出引发反思的问题,以及引导学生制定未来目标和计划。我们收集并分析了多项结果:(a)指导教师在关键时间点的自我评估;(b)对三个指导案例的开放式书面回应;(c)OSTE的视频记录;(d)学生随后对指导教师的评价。为了从工作坊中获取学习情况,对书面案例的回应和视频记录的交流都针对四种期望技能的有无进行了编码。
我们的学习档案袋和指导项目是作为本科医学教育重大改革的一部分而设立的。每届入学的学生班级都会有25名新的指导教师加入,每位指导教师被分配单独指导8至10名学生,形成一种持续4年的指导关系。指导教师按相当于全职工作5%的比例获得报酬。
在指导教师的自我评估中,大多数指导教师报告称,他们在评估学生反思水平、增强反思、使用绩效数据以及指导学生制定目标和计划等方面的感知能力有了显著提高。两个学期后,指导教师对自身能力提升的感知依然存在。学生对指导教师的评价为优秀(82%),他们表示指导教师营造了安全的环境(99%)、促进了洞察力的提升(92%)并协助制定了目标(97%)。在OSTE之前对案例的书面回应显示,一些指导教师遗漏了期望的行为;然而,培训后的回应并未呈现出明显的学习模式。相比之下,对OSTE的编码记录显示,所有指导教师都展示了所有四种期望的技能。
尽管指导教师报告称学到了与关键技能相关的知识,但在检查对书面案例的回应时,学习情况并不明显。相比之下,在OSTE中技能得到了展示,这可能是由于增加了结构化任务以及对反馈的预期。总之,正如指导教师和学生所报告的那样,这个学习档案袋指导教师培训项目实现了其预期目标,即培养出能够展示期望技能的学习档案袋指导教师,为学生提供服务。