Suppr超能文献

甲状腺细针穿刺活检结果不确定的结节究竟是什么?

What really is an indeterminate FNA thyroid nodule?

作者信息

Pezzolla Angela, Lattarulo Serafina, Madaro Andrea, Docimo Giovanni, Lacalendola Emanuela, Prete Francesco, Marzaioli Rinaldo

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2017;88:275-281.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules are usually benign; however, 5 to 15% prove to be malignant. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has become the gold standard in the evaluation of thyroid nodules, especially in single nodule more than a centimeter and / or in smaller nodule with ultrasound characters of malignancy.

METHODS

We evaluated retrospectively 179 patients with "undetermined" thyroid fine needle aspiration, undergoing surgery. We compared cytology and histology and we evaluated sex, age, the presence of thyroiditis and dimension of the indeterminate nodule as predictors of malignancy.

RESULTS

In 48 patients (26.8%) histological examination confirmed the indeterminate cytological diagnosis and this means that the nodule underwent FNA was diagnosed in effects such as cancer. In 29 patients, on histological examination, the nodule underwent FNA was not diagnosed as cancer, but one or more carcinomas were diagnosed in the same lobe of indeterminate nodule, but in different location and / or in the contralateral lobe. In 102 patients, the definitive histological examination did not confirm the suspected diagnosis and we found a significant positive association only between male sex and histological malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The indeterminate FNA still remains a challenge for the surgeon because it is not yet possible to discriminate patients who really need surgery from those that can be followed in follow-up. The potential of molecular diagnostics for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology is promising, but many of these markers are too complex or expensive for routine clinical use or are still poorly standardized.

KEY WORDS

Indeterminate FNA, Thyroid, Thyroid fine needle aspiration.

摘要

背景

甲状腺结节通常是良性的;然而,5%至15%的结节被证明是恶性的。细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNA)已成为评估甲状腺结节的金标准,尤其是对于单个直径超过1厘米的结节和/或具有恶性超声特征的较小结节。

方法

我们回顾性评估了179例接受手术的甲状腺细针穿刺结果“不确定”的患者。我们比较了细胞学和组织学结果,并评估了性别、年龄、甲状腺炎的存在以及不确定结节的大小作为恶性肿瘤的预测因素。

结果

48例患者(26.8%)的组织学检查证实了不确定的细胞学诊断,这意味着接受FNA的结节实际上被诊断为癌症。在29例患者中,组织学检查显示接受FNA的结节未被诊断为癌症,但在不确定结节的同一叶中,不同位置和/或对侧叶中诊断出一个或多个癌。在102例患者中,最终的组织学检查未证实疑似诊断,我们仅发现男性与组织学恶性肿瘤之间存在显著的正相关。

结论

不确定的FNA对外科医生来说仍然是一个挑战,因为目前还无法区分真正需要手术的患者和可以进行随访观察的患者。分子诊断对于细胞学结果不确定的甲状腺结节具有很大潜力,但许多这些标志物过于复杂或昂贵,无法用于常规临床应用,或者标准化程度仍然很低。

关键词

不确定的FNA;甲状腺;甲状腺细针穿刺抽吸活检

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验