• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

团队科学与智慧头脑。

Team Science and Big Brains.

作者信息

Katz Anne

机构信息

Department of Psychosocial Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jul 1;44(4):401-402. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.401-402.

DOI:10.1188/17.ONF.401-402
PMID:28632243
Abstract

Recently, I was honored with the task of moderating a session at the Oncology Nursing Society's 42nd Annual Congress in Denver, Colorado. The panel discussion, "Team Science: A Discussion With the Experts," was described as an opportunity to learn about team science implementation in the conduct of cancer research. The panel members were leaders in oncology research. As the session was about to begin, I looked over at the panelists and decided that this session should have been called "The Big Brains Session" because the panelists are giants in the field. And yes, I was just a little intimidated to be posing questions to the panel, not to mention moderating their discussion.
.

摘要

最近,我有幸承担了在科罗拉多州丹佛市举行的肿瘤护理学会第42届年会上主持一场会议的任务。小组讨论的主题是“团队科学:与专家对话”,该讨论被视为一个了解在癌症研究中实施团队科学的机会。小组成员都是肿瘤学研究领域的领军人物。会议即将开始时,我看了看各位小组成员,心想这场会议应该叫做“智囊团会议”,因为这些小组成员都是该领域的巨头。没错,要向这个小组提问,更不用说主持他们的讨论,我还是有点胆怯的。

相似文献

1
Team Science and Big Brains.团队科学与智慧头脑。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2017 Jul 1;44(4):401-402. doi: 10.1188/17.ONF.401-402.
2
Building a Research Team in Adolescent/Young Adult Oncology Nursing.组建青少年/青年肿瘤护理学研究团队。
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;37(5):330-337. doi: 10.1177/1043454220938359. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
The Process of Oncology Nurse Practitioner Patient Navigation: A Pilot Study.肿瘤护理从业者患者导航流程:一项试点研究。
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;20(2):207-10. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.207-210.
4
Oncology nurses' experience of collaboration: A case study.肿瘤护理人员的协作经验:一项案例研究。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015 Oct;19(5):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
5
Management review of nursing systems.护理系统的管理评审
J Nurs Manag. 1994 Mar;2(2):57-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1994.tb00130.x.
6
The Dual Rounding Model: Forging Therapeutic Alliances 
in Oncology and Palliative Care.双重舍入模型:在肿瘤学和姑息治疗中建立治疗联盟
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Apr;20(2):215-6. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.215-216.
7
Putting both patient need and the science of nursing at the heart of our research agenda.将患者需求和护理科学置于我们研究议程的核心。
Cancer Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;32(6):427-8. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181bbf06c.
8
Cancer Moonshot Task Force Convenes to Tackle Cancer Cure.癌症“登月计划”特别小组召开会议以攻克癌症治愈难题。
ONS Connect. 2016 Mar;31(3):20.
9
The 2014-2018 Oncology Nursing Society Research Agenda.2014 - 2018年肿瘤护理学会研究议程。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2015 Sep;42(5):450-65. doi: 10.1188/15.ONF.450-465.
10
Evaluation and outcome measures in patient navigation.患者导航中的评估和结果测量。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013 May;29(2):128-40. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2013.02.008.