Manon Jacinto, Hussain Mir M, Harris Jonathan, Moldavsky Mark, La Marca Frank, Bucklen Brandon S
*Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Canton, MI †Musculoskeletal Education and Research Center, Division of Globus Medical Inc., Audubon, PA.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):265-271. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000313.
In vitro cadaveric biomechanical study.
To assess revision pullout strength of novel anchored screws (AS) versus conventional larger diameter traditional pedicle screws (TPS) in an osteoporotic model.
Pedicle screws are the most ubiquitous method of treating spinal pathologies requiring lumbar fusion. Although these screws are effective in providing 3-column stabilization of the spine, revision surgeries are occasionally necessary, particularly for geriatric and osteoporotic populations. Innovative technologies should be tested to ensure continued improvement in revision techniques.
For 4 specimens at L2-L5 (T-score=-3.6±0.54), 6.5-mm-diameter TPS were inserted into left and right pedicles and were pulled out; revision screws were then inserted. Polyether-ether-ketone anchors, designed to expand around a 6.5-mm screw, were inserted into all left pedicles. On the contralateral side, 7.5-mm-diameter TPS were inserted at L2-L3, and 8.5-mm-diameter TPS at L4-L5. Pullout testing was performed at 10 mm/min. The maximum pullout strength and insertion forces were recorded.
The initial average pullout force (6.5-mm screw) was 837 N (±329 N) and 642 N (±318 N) in L2-L3 and L4-L5 left pedicles, and 705 N (±451 N) and 779 N (±378 N) in L2-L3 and L4-L5 right pedicles, respectively. Comparison of revision pullout forces versus initial pullout forces revealed the following: 87% and 63% for AS in L2-L3 and L4-L5 left pedicles, respectively; 56% for 7.5-mm and 93% for 8.5-mm TPS in L2-L3 and L4-L5 right pedicles, respectively.
Anchor sleeves with 6.5-mm-diameter pedicle screws provided markedly higher resistance to screw pullout than 7.5-mm-diameter revision screws and fixation statistically equivalent to 8.5-mm-diameter screws, possibly because of medial-lateral expansion within the vertebral space and/or convex filling of the pedicle. AS results had the lowest SD, indicating minimal variability in bone-screw purchase.
体外尸体生物力学研究。
在骨质疏松模型中评估新型锚定螺钉(AS)与传统大直径椎弓根螺钉(TPS)的翻修拔出强度。
椎弓根螺钉是治疗需要腰椎融合的脊柱疾病最常用的方法。尽管这些螺钉在提供脊柱三柱稳定方面有效,但翻修手术偶尔也是必要的,尤其是对于老年和骨质疏松人群。应测试创新技术以确保翻修技术不断改进。
对于L2-L5节段的4个标本(T值=-3.6±0.54),将直径6.5mm的TPS分别插入左右椎弓根并拔出;然后插入翻修螺钉。将设计用于围绕6.5mm螺钉扩张的聚醚醚酮锚钉插入所有左侧椎弓根。在对侧,L2-L3节段插入直径7.5mm的TPS,L4-L5节段插入直径8.5mm的TPS。以10mm/min的速度进行拔出测试。记录最大拔出强度和插入力。
L2-L3和L4-L5左侧椎弓根初始平均拔出力(6.5mm螺钉)分别为837N(±329N)和642N(±318N),L2-L3和L4-L5右侧椎弓根分别为705N(±451N)和779N(±378N)。翻修拔出力与初始拔出力的比较结果如下:L2-L3和L4-L5左侧椎弓根的AS分别为87%和63%;L2-L3和L4-L5右侧椎弓根中,7.5mm TPS为56%,8.5mm TPS为93%。
直径6.5mm椎弓根螺钉的锚定套筒比直径7.5mm的翻修螺钉提供了显著更高的抗螺钉拔出阻力,且固定效果在统计学上与直径8.5mm的螺钉相当,这可能是由于椎间隙内的内外侧扩张和/或椎弓根的凸面填充。AS的结果标准差最低,表明骨-螺钉把持力的变异性最小。