Ghobrial George M, Maulucci Christopher M, Viereck Matthew J, Beygi Sara, Chitale Ameet, Prasad Srinivas, Jallo Jack, Heller Joshua, Sharan Ashwini D, Harrop James S
Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):272-275. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000169.
Open-label laboratory investigational study; non-animal surgical simulation.
The authors perform a comparison of dural closure strength in a durotomy simulator across 2 different suture materials.
Incidental durotomy leading to persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak adds considerable morbidity to spinal procedures, often complicating routine elective lumbar spinal procedures. Using an experimental durotomy simulation, the authors compare the strength of closure using Gore-Tex with other suture types and sizes, using various closure techniques.
A comparison of dural closures was performed through an analysis of the peak pressure at which leakage occurred from a standardized durotomy closure in an established cerebrospinal fluid repair model with a premade L3 laminectomy. Nurolon was compared with Gore-Tex sutures sizes (for Gore-Tex, CV-6/5-0 and CV-5/4-0 was compared with Nurolon 4-0, 5-0, and 6-0).
Thirty-six trials were performed with Nurolon 4-0, 5-0, and 6-0, whereas 21 trials were performed for 4-0 and 5-0 Gore-Tex. The mean peak pressure at which fluid leakage was observed was 21 cm H2O for Nurolon and 34 cm H2O for Gore-Tex. Irrespective of suture choice, all trials were grouped by closure technique: running suture, locked continuous, and interrupted suture. No significant difference was noted between the groups. For each of the 3 trials groups by closure technique, running, locked continuous, and interrupted, Gore-Tex closures had a significantly higher peak pressure to failure. Interrupted Gore-Tex was significantly higher than Interrupted Nurolon (P=0.007), running Gore-Tex was significantly higher than running Nurolon (P=0.034), and locked Gore-Tex was significantly higher than locked Nurolon (P=0.014).
Durotomy closure in the lumbar spine with Gore-Tex suture may be a reasonable option for providing a watertight closure. In this laboratory study, Gore-Tex suture provided watertight dural closures that withstood higher peak pressures.
开放标签的实验室研究;非动物手术模拟。
作者在硬脊膜切开模拟器中比较两种不同缝合材料的硬脊膜闭合强度。
意外硬脊膜切开导致持续性脑脊液漏会增加脊柱手术的发病率,常常使常规择期腰椎手术复杂化。作者使用实验性硬脊膜切开模拟,比较使用 Gore-Tex 与其他缝合类型和尺寸,并采用各种闭合技术时的闭合强度。
通过分析在已建立的脑脊液修复模型中,经标准化硬脊膜切开闭合后发生渗漏时的峰值压力,对硬脊膜闭合进行比较,该模型采用预制的 L3 椎板切除术。将 Nurolon 与 Gore-Tex 缝线尺寸进行比较(对于 Gore-Tex,将 CV-6/5-0 和 CV-5/4-0 与 Nurolon 4-0、5-0 和 6-0 进行比较)。
使用 Nurolon 4-0、5-0 和 6-0 进行了 36 次试验,而使用 4-0 和 5-0 Gore-Tex 进行了 21 次试验。观察到液体渗漏时的平均峰值压力,Nurolon 为 21 cm H2O,Gore-Tex 为 34 cm H2O。无论缝合线选择如何,所有试验均按闭合技术分组:连续缝合、锁边连续缝合和间断缝合。各组之间未观察到显著差异。在按闭合技术分组的 3 个试验组中,即连续缝合、锁边连续缝合和间断缝合,Gore-Tex 闭合的失败峰值压力显著更高。间断 Gore-Tex 显著高于间断 Nurolon(P = 0.007),连续 Gore-Tex 显著高于连续 Nurolon(P = 0.034),锁边 Gore-Tex 显著高于锁边 Nurolon(P = 0.014)。
在腰椎手术中使用 Gore-Tex 缝线进行硬脊膜切开闭合可能是实现防水闭合的合理选择。在本实验室研究中,Gore-Tex 缝线提供了能承受更高峰值压力的防水硬脊膜闭合。