University of South Dakota, United States.
Juniper Gardens Children's Project, University of Kansas, United States.
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Aug;63:119-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
Multiple group longitudinal cross-lagged panel models were implemented to understand the directional influences between teacher-student closeness and conflict and measured math and reading achievement across elementary grades and gender groups using the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development longitudinal sample (N=1133). Specifically, after testing multiple group longitudinal measurement invariance to ensure consistent measurement across genders and time, and tests of equivalence of the latent parameters, we were interested in whether longitudinal changes in teacher-rated closeness and conflict explained longitudinal changes in achievement, and vice versa, and whether those longitudinal influences varied by gender. Latent teacher-student closeness decreased for both genders over time (Cohen's d=-0.15 to -0.32), but latent conflict increased for males (Cohen's d=0.16). There was also increased heterogeneity in teacher-student relationship quality for males relative to females. Math and reading achievement had medium reciprocal effects (β=0.12 to 0.23), and previous math achievement had small to medium effects on subsequent teacher-student closeness (β=0.08 to 0.11) and conflict (β=-0.07 to -0.09). Teacher-student conflict and closeness did not influence subsequent levels of math or reading achievement once previous levels were controlled. Further, these influences were consistent across gender groups despite latent differences in teacher-student closeness and conflict with teachers reporting closer relationships with female students and more conflictual relationships with male students.
采用多群组纵向交叉滞后面板模型,利用国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所的纵向样本(N=1133),了解师生亲密关系和冲突之间的方向影响,并测量整个小学阶段和性别群体的数学和阅读成绩。具体来说,在测试多个群组的纵向测量不变性以确保性别和时间的一致性测量,以及潜在参数的等效性测试之后,我们有兴趣了解教师评定的亲密关系和冲突的纵向变化是否可以解释成绩的纵向变化,反之亦然,以及这些纵向影响是否因性别而异。师生亲密关系随时间推移而下降(Cohen's d=-0.15 至-0.32),但男生的师生冲突却增加(Cohen's d=0.16)。相对于女生,男生的师生关系质量也存在更大的异质性。数学和阅读成绩具有中等的相互影响(β=0.12 至 0.23),并且先前的数学成绩对后续的师生亲密关系(β=0.08 至 0.11)和冲突(β=-0.07 至-0.09)具有小到中等的影响。在控制了先前的水平后,师生冲突和亲密关系不会影响随后的数学或阅读成绩水平。此外,尽管师生亲密关系和冲突存在潜在差异,且报告称与女生的关系更密切,与男生的关系更冲突,但这些影响在性别群体中是一致的。