Suppr超能文献

腰椎侧隐窝狭窄在磁共振成像与临床症状的相关性

Correlation of lumbar lateral recess stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptoms.

作者信息

Splettstößer Annina, Khan M Fawad, Zimmermann Bernd, Vogl Thomas J, Ackermann Hanns, Middendorp Marcus, Maataoui Adel

机构信息

Annina Splettstößer, Radprax MVZ, 40721 Hilden, Germany.

出版信息

World J Radiol. 2017 May 28;9(5):223-229. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v9.i5.223.

Abstract

AIM

To assess the correlation of lateral recess stenosis (LRS) of lumbar segments L4/5 and L5/S1 and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

METHODS

Nine hundred and twenty-seven patients with history of low back pain were included in this uncontrolled study. On magnetic resonance images (MRI) the lateral recesses (LR) at lumbar levels L4/5 and L5/S1 were evaluated and each nerve root was classified into a 4-point grading scale (Grade 0-3) as normal, not deviated, deviated or compressed. Patient symptoms and disability were assessed using ODI. The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used for statistical analysis ( < 0.05).

RESULTS

Approximately half of the LR revealed stenosis (grade 1-3; 52% at level L4/5 and 42% at level L5/S1) with 2.2% and 1.9% respectively reveal a nerve root compression. The ODI score ranged from 0%-91.11% with an arithmetic mean of 34.06% ± 16.89%. We observed a very weak statistically significant positive correlation between ODI and LRS at lumbar levels L4/5 and L5/S1, each bilaterally (L4/5 left: rho < 0.105, < 0.01; L4/5 right: rho < 0.111, < 0.01; L5/S1 left: rho 0.128, < 0.01; L5/S1 right: rho < 0.157, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Although MRI is the standard imaging tool for diagnosing lumbar spinal stenosis, this study showed only a weak correlation of LRS on MRI and clinical findings. This can be attributed to a number of reasons outlined in this study, underlining that imaging findings alone are not sufficient to establish a reliable diagnosis for patients with LRS.

摘要

目的

评估腰4/5和腰5/骶1节段侧隐窝狭窄(LRS)与奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数(ODI)之间的相关性。

方法

本非对照研究纳入了927例有腰痛病史的患者。通过磁共振成像(MRI)评估腰4/5和腰5/骶1节段的侧隐窝(LR),并将每个神经根分为4级评分量表(0 - 3级),即正常、未偏移、偏移或受压。使用ODI评估患者的症状和功能障碍。采用Spearman等级相关系数进行统计分析(P < 0.05)。

结果

约一半的LR显示狭窄(1 - 3级;腰4/5节段为52%,腰5/骶1节段为42%),分别有2.2%和1.9%显示神经根受压。ODI评分范围为0% - 91.11%,算术平均值为34.06%±16.89%。我们观察到ODI与腰4/5和腰5/骶1节段双侧的LRS之间存在非常弱的统计学显著正相关(腰4/5左侧:rho < 0.105,P < 0.01;腰4/5右侧:rho < 0.111,P < 0.01;腰5/骶1左侧:rho 0.128,P < 0.01;腰5/骶1右侧:rho < 0.157,P < 0.001)。

结论

虽然MRI是诊断腰椎管狭窄的标准影像学工具,但本研究表明MRI上的LRS与临床发现之间仅存在微弱相关性。这可归因于本研究中概述的多种原因,强调仅影像学发现不足以对LRS患者做出可靠诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4685/5441455/02d5dc7c4717/WJR-9-223-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验