Raposo Vera Lúcia
Faculty of Law of Macao University, Macao, China and Faculty of Law of Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal, Room 2043, Faculty of Law, University of Macau, E32, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, China.
J Bioeth Inq. 2017 Sep;14(3):339-345. doi: 10.1007/s11673-017-9792-y. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Most courts around the world have been refusing wrongful life actions. The main argument invoked is that the supposed compensable injury cannot be classified as such, since life is always a blessing no matter how hard and painful it is.In opposition to mainstream scholars and the dominant case law, this article sustains that life must be distinguished from living conditions, the former being the real injury at stake, since some living conditions are so intolerable that in themselves they justify a compensation within wrongful life actions.
世界上大多数法院一直拒绝受理错误出生之诉。所援引的主要论点是,所谓的可获赔偿的伤害不能如此归类,因为无论生活多么艰难痛苦,生命本身始终是一种恩赐。与主流学者和占主导地位的判例法相反,本文认为必须将生命与生活状况区分开来,前者才是真正涉及的伤害,因为有些生活状况极其恶劣,其本身就足以在错误出生之诉中成为获得赔偿的理由。