Cochrane in CORR : Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome.
作者信息
Devji Tahira, Busse Jason W
机构信息
Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
The Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2159-2164. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5421-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Cochrane in CORR : Industry Sponsorship and Research Outcome.《矫形与康复护理杂志》中的考科蓝系统评价：行业赞助与研究结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Sep;475(9):2159-2164. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5421-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Association of industry sponsorship and positive outcome in randomised controlled trials in general and abdominal surgery: protocol for a systematic review and empirical study.普通外科和腹部外科随机对照试验中行业赞助与阳性结果的关联：一项系统评价和实证研究方案
Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 27;3:138. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-138.
3
Impact of industry sponsorship on research outcomes.
Am Fam Physician. 2013 Dec 1;88(11):746.
4
Research wastage: industry versus academic sponsorship.
BMJ. 2019 Mar 8;364:l802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l802.
5
Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry.精神病学临床试验报告中的行业赞助与利益冲突
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1957-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1957.
6
Small study on industry trial sponsorship leads to big questions about quality and bias.关于行业试验赞助的小型研究引发了有关质量和偏差的重大问题。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jul 4;99(13):988-90. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm057. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
7
Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias.评估赞助偏差的解决方案。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Aug;34(8):627-30. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022467.
8
Relationship of Industry Sponsorship to Results of Cost-effectiveness Analyses of Drugs Used in Breast Cancer Treatment.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):548-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0139.
9
Relationship of Industry Sponsorship to Results of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Drugs Used in Breast Cancer Treatment--Reply.
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Apr;2(4):549. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0142.
10
Ethical Conundrums in Pain Medicine: The Intersection of Industry Sponsorship, Fee-for-Service Interventions, and Access to Care.疼痛医学中的伦理困境：行业赞助、按服务收费干预措施与医疗服务可及性的交叉点
Pain Med. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):1629-1630. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx199.
引用本文的文献
1
The influence of industry sponsorship and conflict of interest on results and conclusions of systematic reviews regarding treatment of knee osteoarthritis.行业赞助和利益冲突对关于膝骨关节炎治疗的系统评价的结果和结论的影响。
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2021 Feb 16;3(1):100142. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100142. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Does conflict of interest affect the reported fusion rates of bone graft substitutes and extenders?利益冲突是否会影响所报道的骨移植替代物和骨增量材料的融合率？
N Am Spine Soc J. 2022 Mar 13;10:100112. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100112. eCollection 2022 Jun.
本文引用的文献
1
Industry sponsorship and research outcome.行业赞助与研究成果。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 16;2(2):MR000033. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub3.
2
Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial.低强度脉冲超声治疗胫骨骨折的再评估（TRUST）：随机临床试验
BMJ. 2016 Oct 25;355:i5351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5351.
3
Low intensity pulsed ultrasound for fractures of the tibial shaft.低强度脉冲超声治疗胫骨干骨折
BMJ. 2016 Oct 25;355:i5652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5652.
4
Agreements between Industry and Academia on Publication Rights: A Retrospective Study of Protocols and Publications of Randomized Clinical Trials.行业与学术界关于出版权的协议：对随机临床试验方案和出版物的回顾性研究
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 28;13(6):e1002046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002046. eCollection 2016 Jun.
5
Trends in National Institutes of Health Funding for Clinical Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.美国国立卫生研究院对在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的临床试验的资助趋势。
JAMA. 2015 Dec 15;314(23):2566-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12206.
6
The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.医学研究的剖析：美国与国际比较。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 13;313(2):174-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
7
Undue industry influences that distort healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review.不当行业影响扭曲医疗保健研究、策略、支出和实践：综述。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2013 May;43(5):469-75. doi: 10.1111/eci.12074. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
8
Is a subgroup effect believable? Updating criteria to evaluate the credibility of subgroup analyses.亚组效应可信吗？更新评估亚组分析可信度的标准。
BMJ. 2010 Mar 30;340:c117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c117.
9
Overstating the evidence: double counting in meta-analysis and related problems.夸大证据：荟萃分析中的重复计算及相关问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Feb 13;9:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-10.
Zotero 插件