Garcia Jordan A, Mistry Bipin, Hardy Stephen, Fracchia Mary Shannon, Hersh Cheryl, Wentland Carissa, Vadakekalam Joseph, Kaplan Robert, Hartnick Christopher J
Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Sep;127(9):2152-2158. doi: 10.1002/lary.26354. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Providing high-value healthcare to patients is increasingly becoming an objective for providers including those at multidisciplinary aerodigestive centers. Measuring value has two components: 1) identify relevant health outcomes and 2) determine relevant treatment costs. Via their inherent structure, multidisciplinary care units consolidate care for complex patients. However, their potential impact on decreasing healthcare costs is less clear. The goal of this study was to estimate the potential cost savings of treating patients with laryngeal clefts at multidisciplinary aerodigestive centers.
Retrospective chart review.
Time-driven activity-based costing was used to estimate the cost of care for patients with laryngeal cleft seen between 2008 and 2013 at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Pediatric Aerodigestive Center. Retrospective chart review was performed to identify clinic utilization by patients as well as patient diet outcomes after treatment. Patients were stratified into neurologically complex and neurologically noncomplex groups.
The cost of care for patients requiring surgical intervention was five and three times as expensive of the cost of care for patients not requiring surgery for neurologically noncomplex and complex patients, respectively. Following treatment, 50% and 55% of complex and noncomplex patients returned to normal diet, whereas 83% and 87% of patients experienced improved diets, respectively. Additionally, multidisciplinary team-based care for children with laryngeal clefts potentially achieves 20% to 40% cost savings.
These findings demonstrate how time-driven activity-based costing can be used to estimate and compare patient costs in multidisciplinary aerodigestive centers.
2c. Laryngoscope, 127:2152-2158, 2017.
目的/假设:为患者提供高价值医疗服务日益成为包括多学科气道消化道中心在内的医疗服务提供者的目标。衡量价值有两个要素:1)确定相关健康结果;2)确定相关治疗成本。通过其固有的结构,多学科护理单元整合了对复杂患者的护理。然而,它们对降低医疗成本的潜在影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是估计在多学科气道消化道中心治疗喉裂患者的潜在成本节约情况。
回顾性病历审查。
采用时间驱动作业成本法估计2008年至2013年期间在马萨诸塞州眼耳医院儿科气道消化道中心就诊的喉裂患者的护理成本。进行回顾性病历审查以确定患者的门诊利用率以及治疗后的患者饮食结果。患者被分为神经复杂性高和神经复杂性低两组。
对于神经复杂性低和高的患者,需要手术干预的患者的护理成本分别是不需要手术的患者护理成本的5倍和3倍。治疗后,50%的复杂性高和55%的复杂性低的患者恢复正常饮食,而分别有83%和87%的患者饮食情况有所改善。此外,基于多学科团队的喉裂患儿护理可能实现20%至40%的成本节约。
这些发现表明了时间驱动作业成本法如何用于估计和比较多学科气道消化道中心的患者成本。
2c。《喉镜》,2017年,第127卷,第2152 - 2158页。