• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在健康计划中保护员工隐私。

Preserving Employee Privacy in Wellness.

作者信息

Terry Paul E

机构信息

Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO).

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jul;31(4):271-273. doi: 10.1177/0890117117715043.

DOI:10.1177/0890117117715043
PMID:28635323
Abstract

The proposed "Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act" states that the collection of information about the manifested disease or disorder of a family member shall not be considered an unlawful acquisition of genetic information. The bill recognizes employee privacy protections that are already in place and includes specific language relating to nondiscrimination based on illness. Why did legislation expressly intending to "preserve wellness programs" generate such antipathy about wellness among journalists? This article argues that those who are committed to preserving employee wellness must be equally committed to preserving employee privacy. Related to this, we should better parse between discussions and rules about commonplace health screenings versus much less common genetic testing.

摘要

拟议的《维护员工健康计划法案》规定,收集家庭成员已确诊疾病或病症的信息不应被视为非法获取基因信息。该法案认可现有的员工隐私保护措施,并包含了与不因疾病而歧视相关的具体措辞。为何一项明确旨在“维护健康计划”的立法会引发记者们对健康问题如此强烈的反感呢?本文认为,致力于维护员工健康的人必须同样致力于维护员工隐私。与此相关的是,我们应该更好地区分关于普通健康筛查与极少见的基因检测的讨论和规定。

相似文献

1
Preserving Employee Privacy in Wellness.在健康计划中保护员工隐私。
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Jul;31(4):271-273. doi: 10.1177/0890117117715043.
2
Participatory workplace wellness programs: reward, penalty, and regulatory conflict.参与式工作场所健康计划:奖励、惩罚与监管冲突。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):301-18. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12123.
3
A Response to Proposed Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regulations on Employer-Sponsored Health, Safety, and Well-Being Initiatives.对美国平等就业机会委员会关于雇主赞助的健康、安全及福利倡议的拟议法规的回应。
J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Mar;58(3):e103-10. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000698.
4
Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Final rule.《遗传信息非歧视法案》。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 May 17;81(95):31143-59.
5
When public health and genetic privacy collide: positive and normative theories explaining how ACA's expansion of corporate wellness programs conflicts with GINA's privacy rules.当公共卫生和遗传隐私发生冲突时:解释 ACA 扩大企业健康计划如何与 GINA 的隐私规则冲突的正论和规范论。
J Law Med Ethics. 2011 Fall;39(3):469-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00615.x.
6
State legislation to improve employee wellness.
Am J Health Promot. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(4):283-9. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.071218137.
7
U.S. Senate Bill 422: the Genetic Confidentiality and Nondiscrimination Act of 1997.美国参议院法案422:1997年《基因保密与非歧视法案》
Diagn Mol Pathol. 1998 Aug;7(4):192-6. doi: 10.1097/00019606-199808000-00002.
8
Privacy of genetic information: a review of the laws in the United States.遗传信息隐私:美国法律综述
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 2):1292-5.
9
Undermining Genetic Privacy? Employee Wellness Programs and the Law.破坏基因隐私?员工健康计划与法律
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 6;377(1):1-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1705283. Epub 2017 May 24.
10
Confidentiality of employee health records: ethical and legal dilemmas for occupational health nurses.员工健康记录的保密性:职业健康护士面临的伦理与法律困境
AAOHN J. 2003 Sep;51(9):378-83.