Jung Sandy, Toop Carissa, Ennis Liam
1 MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
2 University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Sex Abuse. 2018 Dec;30(8):992-1009. doi: 10.1177/1079063217715018. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
The present study investigated the relationships between the scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and variables relevant to recidivism risk and criminogenic need to inform clinicians' use of the PAI for purposes of treatment planning and risk management. PAI profiles, risk measure and domain scores, and recidivism data were collected for 158 males who have been convicted of sexually offending. Data were analyzed to investigate whether select clinical scales of the PAI correlated with conceptually relevant domains of risk and/or recidivism. Our findings demonstrated that the antisocial scales were consistently associated with risk constructs and recidivism, while very few clinical and personality scales showed relationships with risk constructs. The PAI seems to include select scales that represent risk-related needs, but also, other scales that may be more related to responsivity issues, and therefore may have utility to address two of the risk, need, and responsivity principles.
本研究调查了人格评估量表(PAI)各分量表与再犯风险及犯罪成因需求相关变量之间的关系,以便为临床医生在治疗规划和风险管理中使用PAI提供参考。收集了158名性犯罪男性的PAI剖面图、风险测量和领域得分以及再犯数据。对数据进行分析,以调查PAI的特定临床分量表是否与概念上相关的风险和/或再犯领域相关。我们的研究结果表明,反社会分量表始终与风险结构和再犯相关,而很少有临床和人格分量表显示与风险结构有关联。PAI似乎包括一些代表与风险相关需求的特定分量表,但也包括其他可能与反应性问题更相关的分量表,因此可能有助于解决风险、需求和反应性原则中的两个问题。