• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trends and Outcomes of Off-label Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the NCDR STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的超适应证使用趋势和结果:来自 NCDR STS/ACC TVT 登记处的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):846-854. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1685.
2
Outcomes Following Urgent/Emergent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.紧急/即刻经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局:STS/ACC TVT 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 25;11(12):1175-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
3
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣与三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与死亡率或卒中性事件的相关性。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 11;321(22):2193-2202. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7108.
4
Prevalence and Outcomes of Mitral Stenosis in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Findings From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者二尖瓣狭窄的患病率和结局:来自胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗登记处的研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 9;11(7):693-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.245.
5
Incidence and Outcomes of Surgical Bailout During TAVR: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中外科抢救的发生率和结局:STS/ACC TVT 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1751-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.04.026.
6
Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结果。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2069-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282043.
7
Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣狭窄的时间趋势和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 23;12(18):1811-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.037.
8
Clinical outcomes at 1 year following transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术 1 年后的临床结果。
JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1019-28. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.1474.
9
Association of Paravalvular Regurgitation With 1-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3 Valve.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 SAPIEN 3 瓣膜植入后瓣周漏与 1 年结局的相关性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1208-1216. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3425.
10
Association Between Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid vs Tricuspid Aortic Stenosis and Mortality or Stroke Among Patients at Low Surgical Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣 vs 三叶式主动脉瓣狭窄与低手术风险患者的死亡率或卒中的关系。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1034-1044. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13346.

引用本文的文献

1
Transfemoral TAVR in a Quadricuspid Aortic Valve With Pure Regurgitation: Overcoming Anatomical and Technical Barriers.经股动脉途径行四叶式主动脉瓣单纯反流的经导管主动脉瓣置换术:克服解剖和技术障碍
JACC Case Rep. 2025 Sep 3;30(26):104879. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.104879.
2
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Stroke Prevention During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术期间的发病率、危险因素及卒中预防
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 22;26(4):26867. doi: 10.31083/RCM26867. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Not for Everyone Yet?经导管主动脉瓣置换术:并非适用于所有人?
JACC Adv. 2023 Mar 31;2(2):100288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100288. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Excluded From Clinical Trials.临床试验排除患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的结局
JACC Adv. 2023 Mar 31;2(2):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100271. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement for pure aortic regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 33,484 patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗单纯主动脉瓣反流:33484 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03667-0.
6
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Current Status and Future Indications.经导管主动脉瓣置换术:现状与未来适应症
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 10;13(2):373. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020373.
7
TAVI after More Than 20 Years.20多年后的经导管主动脉瓣置入术
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 30;12(17):5645. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175645.
8
Cerebral ischemic injury after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic regurgitation.单纯主动脉瓣反流患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的脑缺血性损伤。
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2023 Jun 15;24(6):530-538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B2200444.
9
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic regurgitation: A propensity-matched analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣关闭不全患者的倾向匹配分析
Heliyon. 2023 May 26;9(6):e16734. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16734. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
A Policy Approach to Reducing Low-Value Device-Based Procedure Use.一种降低低值器械为基础的治疗方法使用率的政策方法。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1006-1027. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12595. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣疾病。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 9;64(22):2330-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.039. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
2
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗失败的生物瓣。
JAMA. 2014 Jul;312(2):162-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7246.
3
Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术,使用自扩张假体。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 8;370(19):1790-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400590. Epub 2014 Mar 29.
4
2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):2438-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.537. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
5
Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States.美国经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结果。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2069-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282043.
6
The STS-ACC transcatheter valve therapy national registry: a new partnership and infrastructure for the introduction and surveillance of medical devices and therapies.STS-ACC 经导管瓣膜治疗国家注册登记研究:医疗器械和疗法引入及监测的新合作关系和基础设施。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;62(11):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.060. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for pure severe native aortic valve regurgitation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗单纯重度原发性主动脉瓣反流。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1577-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
8
Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.经导管主动脉瓣植入术更新的标准化终点定义:瓣膜学术研究联盟-2 共识文件。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Oct 9;60(15):1438-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.001.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement: outcomes of patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation.经导管主动脉瓣置换术:中重度二尖瓣反流患者的结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 5;59(23):2068-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
10
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在高危患者中的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 9;364(23):2187-98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510. Epub 2011 Jun 5.

经导管主动脉瓣置换术的超适应证使用趋势和结果:来自 NCDR STS/ACC TVT 登记处的见解。

Trends and Outcomes of Off-label Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the NCDR STS/ACC TVT Registry.

机构信息

Section of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle.

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):846-854. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1685.

DOI:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1685
PMID:28636718
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5710589/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for severe aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery and for patients at high operative risk. Use of TAVR for off-label indications has not been previously reported.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate patterns and adverse outcomes of off-label use of TAVR in US clinical practice.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving commercially funded TAVR in the United States are included in the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry. A total of 23 847 patients from 328 sites performing TAVR between November 9, 2011, and September 30, 2014, were assessed for this study. Off-label TAVR was defined as TAVR in patients with known bicuspid valve, moderate aortic stenosis, severe mitral regurgitation, severe aortic regurgitation, or subaortic stenosis. Data were linked with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 15 397 patients to evaluate 30-day and 1-year outcomes.

EXPOSURE

Off-label use of TAVR.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Frequency of off-label TAVR use and the association with in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Among the 23 847 patients in the study (11 876 women and 11 971 men; median age, 84 years [interquartile range, 78-88 years]), off-label TAVR was used in 2272 patients (9.5%). In-hospital mortality was higher among patients receiving off-label TAVR than those receiving on-label TAVR (6.3% vs 4.7%; P < .001), as was 30-day mortality (8.5% vs 6.1%; P < .001) and 1-year mortality (25.6% vs 22.1%; P = .001). Adjusted 30-day mortality was higher in the off-label group (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.04-1.55; P = .02), while adjusted 1-year mortality was similar in the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.98-1.25; P = .11). The median rate of off-label TAVR use per hospital was 6.8% (range, 0%-34.7%; interquartile range, 3.4%-12.1%), with hospitals in the highest tertile of off-label use associated with increased 30-day adverse cardiovascular events compared with the lowest tertile. However, this difference was not observed in adjusted 30-day or 1-year outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Approximately 1 in 10 patients in the United States have received TAVR for an off-label indication. After adjustment, 1-year mortality was similar in these patients to that in patients who received TAVR for an on-label indication. These results reinforce the need for additional research on the efficacy of off-label TAVR use.

摘要

重要性

经美国食品和药物管理局批准,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)可用于不能接受手术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者和高手术风险患者。此前尚未报告 TAVR 用于标签外适应证的情况。

目的

评估美国临床实践中 TAVR 标签外使用的模式和不良结局。

设计、地点和参与者:本研究纳入了在美国接受商业资助 TAVR 的患者。对 2011 年 11 月 9 日至 2014 年 9 月 30 日期间在 328 个地点进行的 23847 例患者进行了评估。将 TAVR 用于已知二叶瓣、中度主动脉瓣狭窄、严重二尖瓣反流、严重主动脉瓣反流或主动脉瓣下狭窄的患者定义为 TAVR 标签外使用。将数据与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)进行了关联,以评估 30 天和 1 年的结局。

暴露

TAVR 标签外使用。

主要结局和测量指标

标签外 TAVR 使用的频率及其与住院、30 天和 1 年不良结局的相关性。

结果

在这项研究的 23847 例患者中(11876 例女性和 11971 例男性;中位年龄 84 岁[四分位距,78-88 岁]),2272 例(9.5%)患者接受了标签外 TAVR。与接受标签内 TAVR 的患者相比,接受标签外 TAVR 的患者院内死亡率更高(6.3%比 4.7%;P < .001),30 天死亡率(8.5%比 6.1%;P < .001)和 1 年死亡率(25.6%比 22.1%;P = .001)也更高。标签外组校正后 30 天死亡率更高(风险比,1.27;95%CI,1.04-1.55;P = .02),而校正后 1 年死亡率在两组间相似(风险比,1.11;95%CI,0.98-1.25;P = .11)。每个医院标签外 TAVR 使用的中位数为 6.8%(范围,0%-34.7%;四分位距,3.4%-12.1%),与最低三分位相比,最高三分位的医院与 30 天不良心血管事件风险增加相关。然而,在调整后的 30 天或 1 年结局中并未观察到这种差异。

结论和相关性

在美国,大约每 10 例患者中就有 1 例接受了 TAVR 标签外适应证的治疗。调整后,这些患者的 1 年死亡率与接受标签内 TAVR 适应证治疗的患者相似。这些结果强调了需要进一步研究 TAVR 标签外使用的疗效。